The dust line thinneth but never gone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Furthermore, it’s “Zeno’s Paradox”, (as in, attributed to Zeno) not “The Zeno Paradox”

    • @betterdeadthanreddit
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Could also be related to the Zima paradox: nobody wants to drink it, somebody keeps buying it but it still won’t disappear from the shelves despite taking a decade off from production.

  • 1024_Kibibytes
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    It’s also an example of calculus because the amount of dust approaches zero, but is never quite zero

    • gonzoleroy
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Thank fuck for the vacuum. The Son of Shark, the Anti-Calculus, Destroyer of Integrals

  • no banana
    link
    181 year ago

    It’s also an example of dust being fucking annoying!

  • astrsk
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    That thin line of dust is just a reminder that you need to vacuum after you sweep.

  • @AbouBenAdhem
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    What makes Zeno’s paradox a paradox is that, despite the logical requirement that moving objects must cover an infinite number of sub-intervals in order to do so, we do, in fact, observe objects move.

    But we never observe that final bit of dust getting successfully swept up, so in that case the paradox is averted.