Faced with new legislation, Iowa’s Mason City Community School District asked ChatGPT if certain books ‘contain a description or depiction of a sex act.’

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    681 year ago

    The ban attempts to comply with a new law requiring Iowa school library catalogs to be both “age appropriate” and devoid of “descriptions or visual depictions of a sex act.”

    Sounds like a stupid law.

    We really shouldn’t have conservatives anymore.

    But also chatGPT seems like the wrong tool for this idiotic endeavor.

    • IndiBrony
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      Massive shout out to the teachers who can still teach that sex ed class without books to describe or show things.

      Guess it’ll have to be a practical lesson 👀

    • @moistclump
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Describes the Bible perfectly. Is that banned in Iowa yet?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Expectations: One day we will have an AI that will instantly go through all the books in our library to identity anything sexual so we can ban them and protect the students.

    Reality: Due to the nature of the Internet any student at anytime can access all the porn in the world from their personal device they carry around everywhere.

      • @5BC2E7
        link
        English
        201 year ago

        Unfortunately partially cutting is basically the norm in US.

        • Random_Character_A
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Not far enough to prevent dirty dirty masturbation and teen pregnancies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -121 year ago

        Can we not start with the ‘/s’ horseshit on this site? It’s absolutely awful and unnecessary.

        • @greavous
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          Yeah because text is a form of communication that is really easy to get subtext/tone from /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Nah, you’re right it’s utterly impossible to imply sarcasm. It is so excruciatingly hard that we have to ruin the sarcasm in order to point it out, but you know what? Better that than inflict the mental trauma of misunderstanding on someone! God knows how much PTSD you’ve avoided triggering in others. You truly are a hero.

            • @greavous
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Is this really that much of an issue? Chill out buddy. It’s text on a website. We’re not murdering anyone.

        • Lux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          tone indicators are useful for indicating tone. if you don’t want to use them, don’t, but anyone that wants to will, and those that need them will apreciate them. /srs

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            How useful it is to change the tone in order to identify it, not obnoxious in the slightest. Save yourself a few scary downvotes, though, don’t you? So I guess it’s worth it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    after much deliberation, the mason city community school district board of education came to the unanimous decision to ban selections from the public library based on the recommendations of a popular chat bot that has recently gained notoriety for simply making shit up. the board felt the unorthodox mode of handling the important choice of children’s education and enrichment was justified as none of the members had actually read a book. the assistant superintendent of curriculum and instruction, who’s job is literally to make such decisions, responded with further explanation, “i have more important things to do.”

  • @KirbySSM
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    So stupid on so many levels

  • @Tangent5280
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    Somebody should ask them to have the bot vet the bible then

  • @Snapz
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Republicans don’t want children to know what abuse is so that they can’t readily articulate (or reference books that depict abuse) when the same is being done to them at home.

    The p in gop stands for projection, and conservatives constantly scream about “others” abusing kids.

  • GigglyBobble
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    And yet those idiots won’t stop their own sex acts and die out already.

  • Andy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rem_inds me of the line from Indiana Jones and the last crusade:

    Why did you find back for ze book Dr Jones? Slap! What is in ze book, Dr Jones? Slap!! What does it tell you zat it doesn’t tell us?? (Catches hand) It tells me that goose-stepping morons such as yourself should try READING books instead of burning them!

    To be fair to the schools, btw, they acknowledge that this isn’t really a good system. They’re not excited to ban books, they’re trying to cover their asses legally from a vague, predatory law designed to force librarians to self censor anything that might possibly risk popping a fundy’s fabricated bubble.

  • @6mementomori
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    sigh ^ that’s the most correct thing you can say here

  • @scarabic
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    In their defense there is all kinds of satanic trans buttfucking and child vivisection by gay vampires in The Handmaid’s Tale.

    Signed, ChatGPT.