Firstly, there is the unstoppable flood of new posts that are added while browsing “All”. Although this doesn’t happen when using the Jerbea app, it sometimes renders “All” unusable in the browser.

This will be resolved once websockets are removed with the next update:

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3008

Secondly, the issue of the same posts being displayed for days under “Hot”. There is already a pull request for this, so it has been fixed and just needs to be implemented:

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3076

Now, the only remaining points for me are:

  1. Links to external instances should automatically be transformed when opened so that one can participate with the account of their own instance. For example, lemmy.world/c/memes should automatically become feddit.de/c/[email protected].

  2. Communities from different instances should be able to merge, allowing users to see the content of all communities across different instances.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    541 year ago

    Links to external instances should automatically be transformed

    100% agree. Getting linked to other instances where I’m not signed in is a really clunky experience. It seems like that’s been happening less since I got on the Jerboa app (or maybe I’m just clicking on less links)

  • @funkyb
    link
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I posted this in Ask Lemmy but since it didn’t get traction I’m gonna piggyback on the visibility of this thread:


    As i learn my way around ActivityPub based services, what stands out to me the most is federation is very much exposed to the users. (That, or I still just haven’t wrapped my head around the architecture details and how they manifest in terms of user experience.)

    Am I just misunderstanding this, or would the end-user experience be more fluid and functional if the federation mechanics were mostly ‘under the hood’. What I mean by that is - right now if there’s a community I would enjoy participating in that is located on a different instance, in order to do that I need to (a) know it exists in the first place, (b) know what instance it is on, and (c) explicitly tell my instance about its address in order to join.

    Would it be possible to have some form of master index (replicated across instances - not a centralized service) along with a public standard for registering an instance/community on the index? And if something like that existed, couldn’t that push what is an inherently more technical detail to lower levels of the implementation, and make for a simpler UX by allowing every instance to expose a more complete list of communities to users from directly within whatever instance they choose to use?

    • EthanolParty
      link
      fedilink
      221 year ago

      This is probably the biggest issue I have with Lemmy right now. To make matters worse, it’s really easy to miss how the system works. A lot of new users on smaller instances probably think this place is a ghost town because they don’t see many communities in the directory. It’s not ideal to have to use an external tool to find communities, then extra problematic that the actual process is so awkward: manually pasting the address from the external site in the search bar, then you get a “community not found” warning but ignore that, then the community will appear but it’ll grab the old posts and not the comments. Weird.

      I can accept that it would be too much if every single instance defaulted to a full local sync of every other community on every other instance, but they should at least show up in a list when searched for, IMO.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      171 year ago

      Am I just misunderstanding this, or would the end-user experience be more fluid and functional if the federation mechanics were mostly ‘under the hood’.

      I know what you mean, but I’m not sure it’s a good idea. Look at the recent beehaw-defederation drama. This would have been totally intransparent if the whole federation thing would be something that’s only running behind the curtains.

    • Master
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, you dont have to do it personally. Just someone from your server has to tell the local server “hey, im interested. Please give this server a feed” and then everyone on that server now gets a feed. You can also use the community search and just select all and then it will search out and then you can subscribe from that page. It’s basically a master list of communities. For instance https://lemmy.world/search/q/pokemon/type/Communities/sort/TopAll/listing_type/All/community_id/0/creator_id/0/page/1 then everyone on lemmy.world now has to deal with an influx of pokemons…

      I might be misunderstanding but it basically works the way you want it to work but in a different way than you want it to work.

      • Myriadblue
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        The mechanics aren’t always smooth for the first subscription to a community on an instance.

        • EthanolParty
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Yeah, notably it pulls all(?) the old posts but not the old comments. Good enough for most use cases but kind of annoying if there were any active discussions you wanted to take part in.

      • @funkyb
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        I think what you’re describing is different. It lists only the communities the current instance knows about, it does not list all communities on all instances, and it doesn’t even list the subset of all communities on known instances.

    • wpuckering
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It may make things simpler for the user, but at the cost of storage and performance of every instance in the index, which won’t scale well as more instances are added over time. I personally think it’s better the way it is. As long as you are educated enough to know how to federate with other instances you choose to federate with, you can keep your own instance minimally connected to only the instances and communities you actually care about.

      Maybe a good compromise would be for such an idea as a globally replicated index, to be optional, so individual instances could keep it disabled if they wanted to. If you choose to enable it as an instance owner, the pain points for your end users go away, at the cost of performance and other potentially negative side-effects. If you choose to keep it disabled, you can still federate with any instances you want, but you won’t participate in the index. Or maybe your instance would be listed and replicated to other instances’ indexes, but your own instance won’t receive updates as the global index continues to grow. Since it would just be for convenient discoverability, there’s not really any problem with that. No functionality would be lost for your or any other instance.

      I think for a platform like this, in any case, a little bit of extra user education goes a long way. We shouldn’t be too afraid of expecting end users to educate themselves a bit, and we shouldn’t be too eager to hold their hands every step of the way. It makes for more adept end users and a healthier overall community, in my opinion. It’s like encouraging movie lovers to get off the couch and exercise once in a while.

      • @funkyb
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        I’d think the cost to storage and performance would be trivially small, not even a rounding error relative to the over server/host loads associated with an instance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Would it be possible to have some form of master index (replicated across instances - not a centralized service)

      Wouldn’t this cause similar issues to blockchains, where new users need to download a huge blockchain file? New instances would need to download an enormous list of every single community on every single server. Wouldn’t that eventually cause issues?

      • @funkyb
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Nah, the file would be small and only instances would need to keep a record of it. It’s no different from the community list already maintained by instances, just would be extended to cover all participating instances. even if there were 1 million rows to the table, that’s a very tiny dataset.

    • TrinitronX
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Would it be possible to have some form of master index (replicated across instances - not a centralized service) along with a public standard for registering an instance/community on the index?

      Sure, this and anything else is possible as long as people have the motivation and knowledge to pursue and implement it.

      Something similar to DNS standards could work for Fediverse sites. In fact, why not piggyback on DNS like the SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and even openpgp4fpr / KeyOxide standards. DNS itself fulfills the first two requirements:

      1. Some form of “master index” - check! ✅
      2. Replicated across “instances” - check! ✅ … in a sense …
      • If you consider: Zone Transfer / AXFR a form of “replication”
      • If you consider DNS servers a “node” / “instance”… rather than just a Lemmy/Kbin/Fediverse “instance”

      For the second point about DNS zone transfer… it used to be the case that anyone could issue the AXFR request to a DNS server. However, this basically dumps all the records on a DNS server’s zonefile for that domain. So, it’s often disallowed nowadays because it discloses all hosts in the zone file, some of which might be considered private by the domain owner. Instead, server admins usually configure this to only be allowed by trusted IP addresses of other hosts. (I guess it’s a very crude form of “web of trust” based on IP allow lists and the whims of a SysAdmin.)

      Maybe the Fediverse has use for piggybacking on DNS via TXT records for some use cases. However, it’s likely that some other decentralized method of replication might be invented specifically for federation with other ActivityPub servers.

  • @zephyr
    link
    241 year ago

    FOSS will keep on improving, and proprietary software will keep on getting worse.

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    What do you mean with

    This will be resolved once websockets are removed with the next update

    I hope it wont be removed throughout the software since its really refreshing to see updates in realtime, be it Upvotes/Downvotes, Comments, Posts etc.

    • DMmeYourNudes
      link
      131 year ago

      If you want that functionality use new. Hot and active are for posts that are popular not for flooding the top of my screen with random posts.

    • @MBM
      link
      101 year ago

      They’re removing it because it puts a lot of load on the servers but I’m not sure how much of it will be removed

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      This is a question that would need to be directed towards the devs ;) I’m not sure about that, but in its current state it’s causing more trouble

  • DarraignTheSane
    link
    131 year ago

    When websockets are removed, does that mean that Lemmy will no longer automatically display new posts, and we’ll need to refresh the page in order to load more?

  • TooL
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Communities from different instances should be able to merge, allowing users to see the content of all communities across different instances.

    Holy crap this is huge news. There are quite a few subs I browse that seem to have fragmented into multiple different instances. Would be great to see those all merge together into one feed.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Sorry if my wording was not clear, but that’s just a wish of mine, not some planned feature!

    • Aesthesiaphilia
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      A feed aggregator or multireddit style feature would be excellent. So I could create a “technology” feed and see the beehaw technology community, the lemmy.world technology community, the kbin technology community, etc.

      Actually merging those communities across different instances, as some have asked for, would be a horrible idea and bypassing the entire point of federation.

      Just want to clarify.

  • Kasrean
    link
    61 year ago

    Yeah your suggestions and a few more are absolutely necessary to make this a viable platform. I don’t think Lemmy or any other alternative is in a reliable enough state right now and almost everyone will just go back to reddit soon. But maybe in a year or so, who knows, depending on the devs (who seem to have questionable takes so I’m not too optimistic).

    • freebrick
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I’m staying. I like what I see now and I am so excited for the upcoming changes. The only way for lemmy/kbin is up!

    • @Evono
      link
      51 year ago

      Atm i like lemmy more , it feels more free and fresh , doesnt feel like i need to expect a removal / censoring from a mod or a filter at every post or comment like on reddit.

      • jrubal1462
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        As part of my onboarding, I watched a YouTube video explaining the FEDIVERSE at some conference that took place a few years ago. He succinctly described the benefits of having instance-level moderation/TOS by calling it,

        "The freedom of speech, and the freedom to filter

        I really like that the platform itself doesn’t impose that, but every community gets to choose what’s best for them.

    • Rottcodd
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I think you’re wrong. I think Lemmy is already at the point at which it will survive and thrive, simply because there are enough people here already who prefer it.

      Yes, there are undoubtedly people who are so unsatisfied here that they’ll end up going back to Reddit. Bluntly, I say good riddance to them. Lemmy doesn’t need them and IMO shouldn’t want them.

  • Irgendwii
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    The developers are doing an amazing job! So much respect for you and the time you are committing! It feels so much more human and homely here, if that makes sense

  • @RedirectedPotato
    link
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Merging communities might be hard, but maybe redirecting a community to another instance? this would also allow people to move communities from one instance to another, which would allow large communities to have dedicated instances, or to consolidate related communities under the same instance.

    Allowing communities to exist across multiple instances is going to be a nightmare now that I think about it, like how will moderation work? I can already see it becoming a new way to spam. Create your own lemmy instance, spam a post, and make it so that no one can delete it. It’ll cause instances to disable open federation, which would mean we’ll end up with only a few allowed instances

    • WheelchairArtist
      link
      31 year ago

      should be fairly easy: send invite to same community on other instance, after merge instances will sync community, moderators will merge.

      But this might bring other problems

      • Aesthesiaphilia
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        That’s destroying the whole point of federation, at that point you might as well have everything on one website

    • ShadowRam
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      You subscribe to a instance of a community.

      Then within that community interface should be a list of all external instances of the same name,
      that you can just click all the check boxes to sub to those too,

      You now have a feed of that instance name that pulls from all of the instances,

      and you can opt out of individual instances being in your feed, of ones where moderation is particularly bad for that particular instance.

      • ShadowRam
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So if I find /m/memes here on kbin… sub to it, then within that sub, I should see a list of

        [email protected]
        [email protected]
        memes@lemmywhatever
        memes@shitworks

        and I can click check boxes or auto-sub to them all.

        and when I go to /m/memes, I would see posts from all memes@xxxxxxx, but I could also uncheck [email protected] if I’m finding a lot of lemmy.ml posts are not being moderated well

        In the future, that list may be ridiculous in size, so add a filter option that it only shows instances that meet a threshold of users or subs.

        Example, only show memes@xxxxxxx of instances that have > 1000 users… or maybe 10000 users. eventually you’ll get a useable list of the most popular instances only.

        It wouldn’t be much different than a filter system on a typical game server browser…

    • EthanolParty
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think multi reddits (which are a highly requested feature now) could be used as a decent compromise.

      Basically imagine users can group communities together into one mini-feed. This could be used for similar communities across multiple instances, like [email protected] and [email protected]. Call them multi-lemmies or subscription groups or web rings or whatever.

      Then, what if moderators could cooperate create their own recommended feeds that users can subscribe to? Maybe even put a link to it next to the “Subscribe” link in the sidebar. If users of both communities are encouraged to sign up for the multi-lemmy, then everybody can see everybody else’s content in one combined feed without having to cross-post.

      Posts are still hosted on their home instance, so there’s no extra work for moderators except over agreeing which other communities can join the ring. If a user doesn’t want to see a particular community for whatever reason, they can still subscribe/unsubscribe to specific communities like before. That way we get the best of both federation and similar communities sharing content.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Both would keep exiating. I imagine it like a federation on the community level. [email protected] could federate with [email protected] and when you view one of the two, you would see the contents of both as if they were one community. When creating a post you would still need to decide to which of both you want to post it, though. This would make sure that there are no problems in the case of “defederation”.

    That’s how I imagine the whole thing. Not sure if there are any negative side effects I can’t think of right now, though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Secondly, the issue of the same posts being displayed for days under “Hot”. There is already a pull request for this, so it has been fixed and just needs to be implemented:

    Adding the “hide” feature from reddit would be an easy fix/stopgap solution. I had a similar issue in reddit when one of my multis included a less active community, so I’d just hide the posts I was done with.

  • @SuperRyn
    link
    11 year ago

    It would also be nice to have bio support, so i could put the fact that i have an account of the same name on mastodon.cloud in there (if you can already do this, please tell me how)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    How would merging communities across different instances? Would one be chosen as the new primary, and the other goes away?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    This is good news, I’m still having trouble getting my homepage to stop showing repeated posts. Also, it’s all fediverse Reddit migration related stuff because it seems to be overriding the popularity of anything else. I’m not sure these algorithms are doing what they are supposed to, as it was my understanding that it should attempt to show a more balanced view of your subscribed communities.