• Southern Wolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Fairphone brings a much better device to market with better cameras, a better screen, likely a better chip, open hardware specifications and modularity, a completely unlockable bootloader (with likely support for CalyxOS and other ROM’s shortly), and up to 8 years of software support(!), but people say they won’t get it because no headphone jack…

    MFW people have their priorities extremely mixed up… That’s been the world now for 6 years, it’s time to get over it. Letting perfect be the enemy of good is how you decide to throwaway something as good as what Fairphone seems to be offering. Sony still offers Android devices with headphone jacks, just don’t be upset if you don’t get another Android version pushed to your device.

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Yeah, it’s not available in my region. But, if it was, I would consider getting it. Snapdragon 778 level performance should be sufficient for most people.

      • Southern Wolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Yeah, I hope the FP5 will come to the US officially too. I know the FP4 could work here, but it apparently did have issues with a carrier or two, or something.

        Hopefully the 5 will bring true support for US markets.

      • Another Person
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        For me it’s the camera. If the best camera I have is the one with me then the one with me is going to be the best I can buy (within reason) if they could get Samsung or Pixel quality (or iPhone I guess) that would be awesome.

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Iphone and samsung did not get their camera chops in months. It took years. Fairphone would take a similar amount of time to reach that. But, yeah, i agree a good camera would be great.

  • Fubber Nuckin'
    link
    English
    271 year ago

    No headphone jack. Real shame i won’t be able to use this phone.

    • elouboub
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I simply cannot understand that decision. Am I supposed to throw away all my headphones now because of this dumb, Apple initiated fad? That big vendors like Samsung and OnePlus follow the inane “courage” displayed by Apple because they also want to be “premium” is understandable, but that smaller vendors, especially the fair phone do it is just dumb.

      Apple creates problems to sell you a solution

        • elouboub
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thanks, but pfffff. So I have to carry around another tiny thing I can lose easily. No thanks.

          • @woelkchen
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            The idea is that you don’t detach the adapter from your headphones. My experience is that it kinda works, there are even ones that allow you to charge at the same time.

            I have some sympathy for Fairphone in that regard because they pay more for the materials and workers than Apple, so it forces their hand to a degree to save costs at other places. A friend has the Fairphone 3 and says the camera is unusably bad… So yeah, they cut costs and consumers stay away because they may need them. I need two physical SIM slots, for example and Fairphone has one since the 4 or so.

            • HidingCat
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              Headphone jack is not about cost cutting, it’s about selling something with a higher profit margin.

              And not detaching the adapter doesn’t work when you have multiple devices.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No they don’t intend you to use the adapter. They want you to buy their Bluetooth earbuds. They remove the headphone jack at the same time they introduce the earbuds. It’s about pushing sales of a disposable electronic thing. To increase their overall revenue. Apple demonstrated this by huge sales of their earbuds. And everyone else once money so they’re following suit. The reason Fair phone is pissing us off is because they said they weren’t like other corporations, they didn’t want extra e-waste, they were doing things to be sustainable, and then they pull the same dick head move. It feels like betrayal

    • NotAPenguin
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      Please stop bogging down the conversation with this every single time fairphone comes up

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Lemmy is full of first adopter technologists. The kind of people who spend all day on the telephone during conference calls, video conferences, whatever. The kind of people who deal with systems that break all the time. A very vocal community who doesn’t like foundational options being removed.

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Ugh. Looks like they may never release a device with a headphone jack at this point. I’m fine with my FP3 but it still comes off a bad move.

    Can they please just bring back the project manager that oversaw the FP3? Since the departure the company has made very questionable design choices and decisions (FP4 without headphone jack, and the unrepairable first gen Fairbuds)

    • WagesOf
      link
      fedilink
      -91 year ago

      Buy a usbc dac for everything you have with that plug from 1975. Join us in the modern world.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But that steals a port used for charging :/
        I thought I didn’t mind when I bought my phone that doesn’t have it at first, but it really sucks having to reach for a dongle when I want to use my good headphones on the phone. If USB-C is really so superior for audio, then that would be a good argument to make 2 USB-C ports, don’t you think?
        Yet barely any manufacturer does it, I only ever saw it on some niche gaming phones. Even if they did that, the jack still has a place IMO, because it’s still so ubiquitous even newer midrange headphone releases use it

        • HidingCat
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Work phone doesn’t have a 3.5mm jack, it’s a lot more annoying than I expected it to be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I think I would be sufficiently mollified if phones that remove the headphone jack had a USB-C port on the top and bottom. I’d still be annoyed but I’ll be like okay they’re trying to make the experience better

      • Fubber Nuckin'
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        The fact it’s that old literally only proves how reliable and effective it is. I don’t want to throw away a good solution for a worse solution just because somebody is trying to paint the worse solution as the future.

    • HidingCat
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      Fair phone really shot themselves in the foot when they removed the headphone jack, especially given their mission statement.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        Yeah it was a real slap in the face. Especially when they debuted their branded Bluetooth headset at the same time. It’s like gee you guys just charge more money for the phone if you want to make more money. Don’t make me suffer

        • @Joris
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          Don’t forget the unrepairable Bluetooth in-ears.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            It’s walking e-waste, in your ear! Not environmentally friendly. Ok sure, the phone needs a battery, but not everything needs a battery!

  • @narrowide96lochkreis
    link
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Has the most compelling hardware features of any Fairphone yet looks like. Also, quite like the design compared to their previous attempts.

    No eSIM though? It does have eSIM.

    Also hope the software or rather firmware stuff is good. And would like to see some competent camera review.

    Also, gotta say, funny how all the headphone jack die-hards from r/Android ended up here. As every single other comment here currently complains about it missing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    It’s too damn big. I got a Fairphone 4 and got rid of it because I just couldn’t properly use it (and because of the poor camera performance on top of that). Now they’re releasing an even bigger phone? I may be the minority here, but that’s a deal breaker for me. I’ll need a new phone in the next few months, but right now I’m only considering the s23 or the Xperia 5 V, just because everything else is just too fucking huge.

    • @SillyBanana
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Exactly. I’m now on 4 years old Samsung S10e, with replaced battery and display, because I can’t see myself using ANY of the new phones. All of them are so giant and heavy, and I already feel like I’d like something smaller than my current one… I guess the Fairphone philosophy wins anyway, hehe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Specifically, the Qualcomm QCM6490 octa-core SoC is used in the Fairphone 5, which is actually more intended for embedded and industrial applications. The chip has eight cores and reaches up to 2.7 gigahertz, whereby the performance should be on the level of the Snapdragon 778G 5G .

    (Machine translated.)

    Interesting. I’ll wait for benchmarks before jumping to conclusions. Considering how Qualcomm has been raising prices, I’m not really surprised that vendors are crawling down the product line.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      In the article it mentions that the SoC might have been chosen because on it’s extended software support of 8 years. Industrial tier electronics also usually cost more than consumer counterparts, so unlikely a cost cutting measure

    • @woelkchen
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      I’ll wait for benchmarks

      Fairphone was never about the high-end. Don’t expect anything marvelous.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        It doesn’t need to compete with current gen flagships, these are just overkill anyway even for me as a heavy user also using it for my work etc. What they do need is “good enough” performance (i.e. 2/3 years old flagship performance) and a decent camera, that’s I think what was lacking that actually impacts users.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          This is basically Google’s approach now. I’m a little disappointed that my Pixel 7 from 2022 underperforms the 2019 flagship it replaced, but it’s a compromise I’m willing to make for timely security updates.

          Sounds like the Fairphone 5 might be in a similar performance tier.

  • @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    There are currently 11 modules, which are user replaceable. It has 8GB of ram. It would’ve been so much cool if it was upgradable to something like 12/16GB.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Too expensive for me. I understand why, like the whole being “fair” thing and all but those specs are not good enough for 700€.

  • @Fallenwout
    link
    English
    -41 year ago

    Not even a fhd screen, only 90hz, with a camera cutout while it has bezels…

  • @wholeofthemoon
    link
    English
    -141 year ago

    People who don’t have wireless headphones yet, why are you living in 2015?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We want to reduce our phone risk surface. Bluetooth is a serious security risk

      We want to be able to use the same headset on our computers and our phones

      We wanted easily be able to replace our headset if it breaks anywhere in the world

      We don’t want to have to charge yet another thing in our daily carry bag

      We want to keep everything simple so it just works always

      Wired audio is lower latency, which is better when talking to people

      Wired audio has higher quality! (default bluetooth microphone / headset audio is terrible…)

    • @neumast
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Why not let ppl chose what they want to use?

      Personally I use both, wireless and wired headphones/speakers. Sometimes Bluetooth is better, sometimes the headphone-jack is more convenient.

      Is this so difficult to understand?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      You know how convenient it is to just have some wired headphones lying around in the car in case I need them for some reason? (Like if I forgot my wireless ones for the gym).

      I can’t do that with wireless headphones, the battery will passively run dry.