Chief Justice John Roberts touted the independence of the federal judiciary as a “counter-majoritarian check” and urged Americans rattled by partisan politics to keep faith with the Constitution in an annual report Wednesday that steered clear of direct discussion of modern controversies.

Roberts’ history-heavy statement made no mention of Donald Trump, nor the intense conflict that has cropped up between federal courts and the White House since his second inauguration nearly a year ago.

Trump has questioned the legitimacy of courts that paused his policies and called for the impeachment of judges who ruled against him.

  • hateisreality
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fuck you, you lying fuck… YOU’RE literally the driving force for why we have lost faith

  • ProfThadBach
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well maybe he should uphold the Constitution instead of wipe his ass with it.

  • Formfiller
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    This dude will go down in history as the man who put the final nail in the coffin of the “republic” all representation of the people died with citizens united. Our government is now literally occupied by Israel and oligarchs a lot of whom are immigrants from South Africa

  • LOGIC💣
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    3 days ago

    “This arrangement, now in place for 236 years, has served the country well,” Roberts wrote in the report, which was released by the Supreme Court hours before the start of the new year.

    “It was only when I started giving Trump all of the power that is supposed to lie in the Supreme Court that the arrangement started to fail,” Roberts continued. “I thought I could get an even greater position of power by kowtowing to the demands of Trump, but now he says that my ass isn’t as supple as it used to be, and that I keep losing concentration when I’m servicing him. But what can I do? He keeps falling asleep in the middle. Justice Thomas said the same thing. I knew people had said that with Trump, loyalty is a one-way street, but it’s shocking to experience it myself. I used to have all the power in the world, but now I just really feel used by this whole ordeal.”

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    A report full of right-wing lies. Might be worth mentioning that point.

    What Roberts really doesn’t want is for Congress to exercise its constitutional power to regulate the workings of the Supreme Court and to establish ethical standards backed by law.

  • NatakuNox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    He’s mad that the lower courts aren’t completely corrupt and the poors aren’t worshipping his decisions.

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    I suspect he’s more concerned with potential congressional action to limit corruption or in imposing term limits on Supreme Court Justices than he is in any powers that Donald Trump has taken upon himself.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      IF Dems ever take power back, and wield it responsibly and with purpose this time, they’ll expand the court by at least four seats, impose term limits, AND impeach Thomas, and probably Alito, and then prosecute Thomas and his bulldog wife for corruption and sedition.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m holding out hope. This will be our absolute last chance, and the Dems can’t drop the ball this time, like they did during the Biden administration.

          If we can pull off a Congressional bloodbath in the Midterms, the incoming people will know that they are being elected to be warriors, and will demand bold action from Dem leadership, starting with the resignation of Schmuck Schumer, and probably Jeffries, who isn’t much better.

          Or not, and Democratic America will be over. Then the only chance will be violence.

  • Bwaz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Says the unabashedly biased, bought and paid for chief justice

  • Seaguy05
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just a prep for when the GOP loses significantly in the mid terms and the pendulum swings back against them. There is no intent to not be in lock step with project 2025, it is just a coincidence. I hope there’s significant restructure of the supreme court soon as more than half of them are bought and paid for.

  • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ya know it’s kinda funny that I’m finding I agree with Justice Roberts, I think it would be great for the Judiciary to be a ‘separate but equal’ “branch” of our government. No, really, this is a great idea. Like we could have like maybe three, separate but equal branches, maybe this is a stretch, but we could call them, umm, The Judiciary, The Legislative, and the Executive Branches.

    • captainlezbian
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      What if each of them actually did their job? And only their job? Or am I being too fantastical?

      • AA5B
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        And maybe that “separate but equal” can serve as a check and balance to keep any branch from abusing their power …. Or is that off the deep end?

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That sounds great! The only way I could envision it failing is if one branch gave another outsized power in a partisan bid, while another refused to be a check on other branches… Boy, that would fly in the face of the Constitution and introduce a fundamental crisis for our country…

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m sympathetic to the idea that we don’t need a “Supreme Court”. We have a representative legislature. They don’t even follow the constitution or precedents. Frankly the institution is illegitimate.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sorry bud, an indepdent judicary ship sailed a long time ago. As soon as people started labeling judges as liberal or conversative, Democractic or Republican appointed, etc.

    This kind of wording confirms that judges are just part of the political process.