• @flossdaily
    link
    1521 year ago

    It doesn’t matter

    Their viewers literally do not care about the truth.

    Their entire belief system would be unraveled in minutes if they took the time to look at any original sources.

    The “do your own research” crowd isn’t smart enough, or isn’t inclined to do even the slightest bit of actual research.

    • @TokenBoomer
      link
      231 year ago

      They were never equipped to by the American education system.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        yeah sure, but as a person who’s entire education was neglectful parents throwing a textbook in front of me and basically leaving me unsupervised, its kinda on them.

        we have the entirety of human knowledge in our pockets and ive met conservatives who think the scps they see on tiktok exist and the government covers it up.

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          101 year ago

          Congratulations 🍾 You have successfully displayed survival bias on the internet. Please accept your prize 🏆 before exiting.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            ehhh not really, as I didnt go through the american education system. Im more like a plane that didnt see combat that returned to base with no bullet holes, so officers concluded that everything is borked and a single bullet will down a plane.

            But what I am saying is that ehhhh shits dumb and people should be less dumb, and they really have no excuse for continuing to be dumb like this.

            by all means, we should improve society somewhat, including the american education system. If the american education system was better, Id have likely been allowed to go to public school and would thus have better social skills, allowing me to party and live up being a young twink rather than chat with folks on a budding social media site.

            • @TokenBoomer
              link
              31 year ago

              If the prize was rewarded in error, the company will not be held liable. You may return the “prize,” but it is not advisable. The company will not exchange prizes except in cases of allergic reactions or severe disdain. If you need to return the prize, please go www.The_Company/prizereturn.com.

        • @PrinceWith999Enemies
          link
          51 year ago

          If one person fails at something, maybe it is on them. We don’t want to rush into some kind of moral judgment about them deserving the consequences because they may have issues with their personal history, cognitive abilities, or relationships that led to the failure, but it’s still individual characteristics (even if it’s not their fault, per se).

          If hundreds of thousands to millions of people are failing in the same way, we’re looking at a systemic problem rather than a personal one, and bootstraps aren’t the answer. Don’t think about it like someone who made it and is justifiably proud of what they did. Think about it like a statistician. How many people in similar circumstances to yours made it without falling into religious fundamentalism, conservative politics, or even substance abuse and being stuck wherever their birth landed them? I bet it’s a pretty high percentage, even if we only count the ones whose parents threw them a textbook.

          Systemic problems require systemic solutions. We have a lot to get through before we can get there, but it’s still easier to fix if the problems are properly diagnosed - and demonstrably the existence of the internet and smartphones is not solving it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            yes, however:

            being a victim of a systemic problem doesnt really justify being a racist and homophobic bigot that clings to a false narrative in spite of overwhelming evidence.

            and when a group of people have decided to be hateful to me because of shoddy reasons, ive decided I can say whatever I like about them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            i hear you but we have the internet widely available.

            Im not arguing that the american education system is adequate, im just saying that at some point, people have a responsibility to not follow belief systems that can be disproven with a few hours of research.

            it requires a lot of head in sand to be a modern fundie repub

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              The internet on its own is not a solution given anyone can make a website and say whatever they want on it.

              I was arguing with a guy here on Lemmy who though nationalpriorities.com was a more reliable source of information than Wikipedia.

              People need to be taught how to use the internet, how to find sources for the information and filter out lies and falsehoods. That takes a good education, which many people lack.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                a lot of people dont trust the school system or modern research and studies, its quite sad and i’ve no clue how to counteract that.

                people who think school is liberal brainwashing arent going to listen to school when it teaches how to critical think.

                Idk, school should get more funding, but again i think its that guys fault for thinking that.

                dont get me wrong, that guy should also get the resources they need, but like…cmon…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Bingo! A huge portion of the country are taught to: not question authority, study to the tests, and not critically think about things.

        • @TokenBoomer
          link
          11 year ago

          The state will never give you the tools to overthrow it.

    • Evie
      link
      91 year ago

      What they mean when they say do you own research, they mean listen to their newscasters only and just trust them… because they did the research and if you your self did it, it would be biased… so just trust them bro. Crazy lunatics…

    • @Red_October
      link
      61 year ago

      Worse than that, they will actively reject the truth when it’s inconvenient to them. They will choose to believe her deceptive edits are somehow more true than actual reality, even if they flat out know it was deceptively edited.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    631 year ago

    You mean manipulating? Thats manipulation

  • @Buffaloaf
    link
    451 year ago

    And Fox news audiences will never know about it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Does it matter? The people who believe her aren’t going to look into the quotes or even verify they happened because they think she’s right and it sounds plausible in their world view. They won’t see the articles showing she’s wrong. Laura’s not getting banned for manipulation because it’s manipulated in their favor. And if someone did ban her from appearing on Fox News she’d just hop to OANN or something instead and they’d blame “democrats” or “cancel culture” or some stupid made up reasoning for why and it’d probably strengthen their resolve in believing this BS.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    They know it doesn’t matter

    The pawns will volunteer parroting the BS to all their friends. “Did you hear Biden say” and it will be a fact as far as their jello brains are concerned

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    She was not “busted”. She does it on purpose and knows that it doesn’t matter how many times she’ll be caught. She knows there will be no material consequences, not by her opponents, not by the fans, not by the legal system that’s pretends its purpose is to keep people like her in check. It doesn’t matter.

  • Bizarroland
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    My question is, why has nobody filed a lawsuit against Fox News for committing these acts of deception?

    There’s got to be an angle somewhere. They are misleading the population while claiming to be a news source. There should be some sort of ruling that says that what a news source says has to at least have some grounding in the truth to the best of the newscasters ability to verify.

    • @namelessdread
      link
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The law hasn’t really caught up. There are regulations from the FCC, including in regards to distributing false information, but only for broadcast television. Fox News (and many others, such as CNN, MSNBC, etc) are cable news channels run by private providers, so they are not subject to those FCC regulations.

      While companies have sued, such as Dominion, there really aren’t any grounds for the audience/consumers suing. They didn’t suffer any damages.

      That being said, there do need to be changes in how ethics are enforced in media and journalism.

      • Bizarroland
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        If the law is not up to date then it seems ripe for the picking.

        Some enterprising law firm out there needs to find some clients and get on this because there’s beautiful pocket change for their cut if they can figure out exactly the right angle to take.

      • TigrisMorte
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        That under the Legal System, (we don’t have a justice System), Citizens “didn’t suffer any damages” is the telling part.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Its been brought up before (tucker Carlson argued in court mo reasonable person would believe him), the TLDR is the law is outdated and nobody with power cares

  • StarServal
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Me: “How dare they!”

    Also me: “I’m not going to investigate any further than the title because it sounds true.”

    • Piecemakers
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      one of them. one of them. one of them. one of them.

  • @Zippy
    link
    31 year ago

    I watched the full video. She shortened the speech but did it change the meaning or make it deceptive? I don’t like her message much but I missed where the deception came from. It seems like an opinion piece with her fully disagreeing with Biden. Am I missing something? Real question.