• TheFonz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think Netflix manufactured this problem first. Originally they were going for volume so they added a lot of padding to their og shows. To the point I stopped watching (torrenting) any Netflix originals. So people got in the habit of doing other stuff while waiting for the plot to start moving again. Now they claim that their shows are meant for second screens. Motherfucker: we are in the golden age of TV, so there’s plenty of engaging content being produced. Marvelous Mrs. Maisle is so fast paced and brilliant I never felt the need to pick up my phone.

  • ambientdread
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Or we are on our phones because the movies repeat their themes over and over and over again

    • gustofwind
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      i dunno, most people i see watch netflix seem to use it as just another mode of stimulus because they need to always be completely inundated with flashing screens at all times to feel calm

  • BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Writer insight : if people start pulling their phone when they should be watching your movie, it means your movie is shit, not that it should be made even sloppier. Watered down shit is still a shit cocktail.

  • Switorik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is what kills any articles on the web. The first three paragraphs repeat the question you’re looking to get answered and the last paragraph vaguely answers it.

    I feel like an old person now but I’ve started watching movies from the 90s/2000s and I can’t believe how much worse movies have become over the years.

      • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Also the more repetition the more room on the page for ad spots. Same reason so many Youtubers restate the same shit almost verbatim over and over and over; it pads the video so Youtube can cram in more ad spots.

  • yogurt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The amount of reciprocal effort art is socially allowed to demand from the audience changes. The art form gets refined and people respect that and are willing to invest more attention, then at some point it’s opera and nobody goes because it requires too much attention and respect. Netflix might suck but on the other hand Christopher Nolan is making movies with inaudible dialogue and Game of Thrones has invisible fight scenes because they got out of hand with it and think they can demand you only watch their thing alone in a soundproof HDR screening room.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s the big tech social media disease.

    Everyone, frigging everyone who steps away from fb/insta/twittler/yt/tiktok/… says the same “holy shit my mind is so peaceful all of a sudden.” And somehow it’s not substantially part of the daily discourse. Somehow between that and EVERYTHING else these mfrs are responsible for (protecting pedos, encouraging insurrections, …) just flies.

    It’s a disease, an addiction, a plague and we gotta start naming it as such. Talk to your loved ones and carefully try to get them off that shit.

      • brucethemoose
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Lemmy/Piefed is an echo chamber, and has some structural issues like Reddit. But there’s no algo, no advertising, nor constant phone notifications.

        And, uh, no billionaires warping “open” discourse.

        To me, it’s a time black hole, worse than old forums. But it’s not nearly as bad as (say) Discord or anything Facebook owned.

        • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          nor constant phone notifications.

          Until emails broke on our instance I used to get email notifications for replies, which would send a notification to my phone, which would get forwarded to my smart watch.
          So, uh, yeah.

      • ken@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        It can. Depends on how you use it. Wear gloves and goggles when handling .ml and such.

      • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        You tell me:

        -are you getting ads/shorts/brainrot shoved in face every single second?

        -is the public on lemmy tolerant of sexoffenders? Nazis?

        -ads? (Yes, I initially misspelled it as “adds” this guy right here)

        -do you have superfluous bs following you around?

        I think not.

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Good thing we canceled our Netflix subscription last year when Trump threatened to invade our country the first time.

    Even greater that now that he is threatening to do it again, and seemingly is more serious about it, we are one year into being back on physical media and we fucking love it. Dvds and blurays are so much better than shitflix.

    • Bloomcole
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Canceling Netflix wil certainly compensate for the brilliant decision of our EU clowns to get 70% of our gas from the US to own the Russians.
      As if the price isn’t killing the EU industries already the orange clown now has another massive leverage tool.

  • hakunawazo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    You could absolutely do it in a funny way like Kronk (Emperors New Groove) or Luis (Ant-Man).

  • anon_8675309
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Make content that makes people put their phones down.

    • Triasha
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is part of the genius of kpop demon hunters. It moves fast, sometimes frenetically.

  • aeronmelon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Make movies that are engaging enough to keep people from checking their feeds while they wait for something to happen.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      My wife said that the Wire was hard to follow and boring, but she also checked her phone every 5 minutes and was carrying on a conversation there with her friends. She also impulsively pulled out facebook and scrolled a bit. I pointed all this out but Its still the shows fault somehow.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      2 days ago

      I dunno man, I can’t get my friends to watch some stellar movies because their attention span has been shot over time.

      Believe it or not, they’ll watch crappier movies because they don’t need to pay attention.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Part of it is the movie, but a large part is that short form video trains your brain to need frequent dopamine fixes. A 5 second video does that, while a 90 minute movie might not give it until the climax.

      It’s not much different than a smoker taking a break during a movie.

      • aeronmelon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If someone starts a movie and immediately pulls their phone out or starts cleaning, that’s on them.

        And movies absolutely should not be made to cater to addiction. Nothing should, except for something explicitly designed to help people recover from addiction.

        When movies have a good idea and are given the proper attention to make them well, regular people won’t be checking the time or reading blogs when they become bored. The problem is that studios say that, good idea or not, proper attention to the craft or not, we’re making this many movies this year. We’re lucky if a few of those movies are something future generations would consider good.

        Matt Damon is suggesting that movies be made even worse than they already are.

        • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 day ago

          Matt Damon is suggesting

          It definitely reads more as “Netflix execs suggest and Matt Damon complains about”

      • WhyIHateTheInternet
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can’t stand short videos. I won’t even watch videos that aren’t an hour or longer myself. I don’t get these shorts, it’s so unsatisfying.

        • [object Object]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I’ve watched through ‘Severance’, which is very popular afaict. It’s chock full of protracted shots padding the runtime. Either the directors (mostly Ben Stiller) think they’re new Kubricks, or the directive was to make the show longer. Idk what Netflix gets from a longer show, when a season is dumped all at once anyway — presumably more space for ads, which are apparently there now. I wouldn’t feel much guilty about checking the phone in between any meaningful action.

          The only new film that really gripped me in the past few years was ‘The Substance’, which felt like oldschool Cronenberg stuff. Ironically it’s comparatively long, and doesn’t even have much dialogue.

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            First and foremost, you’re complaining about pacing, not writing. Second, that’s your opinion and that’s fine. Personally, I don’t think every single second needs to move the plot forward. I’m perfectly fine with sections of it being transicions or world building or other stuff.

            Your opinion’s fine though. Just go watch something else. However, you not liking something doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily bad, nor good.

            If the substance really is the only film that gripped you in the past few years, then you either are terrible at picking movies or you just don’t really like cinema all that much.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It literally doesn’t work for most people anymore

      Short form videos fried people’s attention and dopamine needs

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        lol yea, toootally nothing to do with it. That’s why nobody ever talks about great movies, and movies toooootally aren’t getting longer nad longer… yep, totally not a quality to attention thing.

        Not like there are legendary movies that are several hours long that people still watch… Yep, quality has nothing to do with how long people stay engaged with movies!

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The fact that classics exist has literally nothing to do with this discussion. Also, no, movies aren’t getting longer. Source.

          There are plenty of great films still being made every year. If you don’t watch or like them, that’s a you problem.

        • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The Intro to the film, “One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest” comes to mind.

          Great film, slow, steady, meaningful.

        • IWW4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Bud… people are on thier phones constantly… there nothing that will stop that…

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Do the people who have their phones out in films nowadays watch those old movies without looking at their phones, hmm?

          Your snark makes you sound like an arsehole.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            My snark is because it was an assinine statement that was said rudely. I don’t know why you’re mad at me and not the rude person with the wrong opinion.

  • NotMyOldRedditName
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now I’m curious, am I checking my phone after they’ve repeated the same thing 3 or 4 times and now I’m bored / annoyed?

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Sorry Damon but Thats just the world now, we all watch while on our phones when we stream and you aren’t going back ever

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    2 days ago

    I find shows and movies that show something happen clearly and then restate it in the dialogue immediately quite annoying. Very common in anime.

        • Jesus_666
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          To be fair, that can be necessary to make the action understandable, especially when you’re adapting a game that you don’t expect the viewers to be experts in. (Which is always because these shows are usually supposed to be advertisements.

          Imagine an MtG-themed show where battles looked like this:

          Player A: “Okay, your turn.”

          Player B: “Untap, draw… In my precombat main I play Isochron Scepter with Pongify.”

          Player A: “Fold.”

          Spectator: “Yeah, that was obviously unwinnable.”

          …without even bothering to explain the cards, much less why player A’s game couldn’t stand up to a questionable use of an Isochron Scepter.

          (Of course a particularly egregious case was Yu-Gi-Oh, which needed these explanations because the card game as shown on the show made no sense.)

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wonder if its due to how closely Anime attempts to animate Manga? I feel like you can kind of “explain” what happens in text alot more smoothly than on a TV show due to how much faster you ingest knowledge.

      • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Often it’s a localization issue too. Japanese dialogue doesn’t translate easily to English, it’s usually longer and has more layers of formality that English can’t express. And they often aren’t allowed to cut the content, so they have to make the English super wordy and explainy to match the long winded mouth flaps.