yes “america bad” is a valid political stance

  • @MashedTech
    link
    22 years ago

    Also, off topic, who else is bad?

    • Łumało [he/him]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      The entire anglo-sphere definitely, South Korea is a good contender… Every country that collaborated with the nazis extensively in the past doesn’t really have a good track record even nowadays. France is very, very high up there. But still, these countries do not really compare to the US in terms of being absolutely horrible.

  • @ShittyRedditWasBetter
    link
    02 years ago

    Posted from Eastern Europe in Poland 🤣

    Merica bad, but pls help us Daddy, we can’t defend ourselves against the Russians 🤣

  • @SaakoPaahtaa
    link
    02 years ago

    USA is based though. Cia has got the be one of my favourite organisations

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -62 years ago

    “Oh boy! Can’t wait to know all the man-made horrors, war crimes, and crimes against humanity the United States of America did! Just so I can find my hatred of capitalism all the more justified!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I know, it’s just that having the knowledge that they’re doing them doesn’t stop them from doing atrocities against mankind either. Knowledge is both a blessing and a curse.

        • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Perhaps it won’t stop them, but at least you won’t fall for people downplaying the ones they are currently committing

  • @Omgarm
    link
    -302 years ago

    Pretty much all of history has horrors! Endless entertainment.

    • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 years ago

      There’s a special level of evil in genociding indigenous peoples for the fun of it and nuking Japan (who was already ready to surrender) twice!

      • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
        link
        -42 years ago

        They were literally warned multiple times and no, they were not trying to surrender.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          lmao they only refused the unconditional surrender, which detailed the complete occupation of the nation, removal of the emperor, and the arresting of all their politicians which the japanese told the americans it was unacceptable (however they agreed to the occupation).

          Well guess what? The fucking americans didn’t even bother doing their conditions right and just accepted japans previous proposal, and this was AFTER they firebombed tokyo to dust, and nuked 100,000s of people. What a shitty decrepit nation you have there.

          • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
            link
            12 years ago

            Maybe don’t be a genocidal, brutal, horrific, deplorable, inhumane, piece of shit and you won’t experience the consequences of your actions.

            Japan committed just as many atrocities as the Nazis. They slaughtered/raped/murdered/destroyed thousands of people.

            There’s a reason they call it the rape of nanking

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Amazing a settler like you deserves any kind of moral authority when your entire nation has wiped a whole race of people from the face of the earth. Why tf are you even talking to me about Japanese crimes against humanity, I am talking about the unnecessary american war crimes in ww2, japan was a shitty imperialist nation, why would I defend it?

              I am not from the country which actively encourages the rehabilitation of the genocidal japanese empire, and seeks a new wave nationalism within japan to share the spear. So how about you list those war crimes to your nearest politician, and get that message to them since they clearly have not got it.

      • @NotSoCoolWhip
        link
        -262 years ago

        We didn’t nuke Japan for fun. We warned civilians by dropping pamphlets. They had just weaponized the bubonic plague on china. When the bombs were dropped, they had planned on doing the same biological attack on San Francisco in two weeks.

        The Japanese were arguably worse than the Nazis, but their evils during the war were erased because they were such a convenient trading partner. Not even their own citizens learn about their atrocities, especially in the way that Germany does.

        • @chuckleslord
          link
          182 years ago

          Neither of the atomic bombs had warnings, those were pamphlets for the fire bombings of Tokyo. The goal was to spread fear of what we could do to the whole world. We used Japan as a fucked up example.

        • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The Japanese were arguably worse than the Nazis

          Many things they did were problematic, but I don’t remember Japan doing a Holocaust

          Edit: Thanks for the info, comrades.

          • @NotSoCoolWhip
            link
            32 years ago

            What about the invasion of mainland China? Rape of Nanking? What about the vivisection of living test subjects? Manchurian testing?

            They may not have done a holocaust, but they did a lot worse shit in other areas. The medical testing was the worst to learn about. The worst thing is they got away with it, not admitting to any of it until later. Japanese leadership completely skirted any type of Nuremberg-type consequences.

    • El Barto
      link
      -202 years ago

      Damn. You’re a dark, dark, lemmier.

      I like it!