- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- 196
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- 196
cross-posted from: https://freesewing.social/users/Rania/statuses/116147153317210978
FUCK ISRAEL FUCK ISRAEL FUCK ISRAEL
FUCK ISRAEL FUCK ISRAEL FUCK ISRAEL
Gaza before the war and Gaza after the war… it has become uninhabitable. Please don’t abandon us; we need your help.
https://gofund.me/d0cc0587
#GazaVerified #israel #genocide #famine #settlerColonialism #apartheid #StopIsrael #STOPtheGENOCIDE
#Gaza
@[email protected] @[email protected]
@jeffowski
@Gardenia
@simon_brooke
@stephanies
@tsbasatoru
Holy moly, that’s one hell of a comparison. Is there a less jpeg version of this?
You can use google earth to look at the historical aerial imagery in high resolution.
PS: I know no foss/degoogled alternative for high resolution images like that, so if anyone knows, please share
I think there are places you can get raw satellite images of the places that aren’t Google (Google sources satellite data externally) though for high resolution versions it’s not free, and might not even be cheap. It’s also not pre-stitched into a map, it’s just the images.
Yes, we can get easily images from landsat or sentinel satellites, but the resolution isn’t enough for seeing individual buildings like that, unfortunately. there are also the cbers ans an indian satellite which I don’t remember the name, offering free high resolution images (still not on par with the ones in google maps), but will lack global coverage
Were the photos taken at the same time of day and year? Not to diss the message, which is obviously that Israel is destroying Gaza, but I want to make sure we’re not misrepresenting anything for exaggeration
The destroyed buildings don’t regrow in the spring.
I have to laugh or I’ll cry…
deleted by creator
Not necessarily, if you frequently reference satellite imagery like in the open street map community, you’ll notice that colors and saturation cary wildly between satellites, because they use different techniques to get clearer pictures through various atmospheric effects, and some techniques give greyscale output which may just be combined with color data without much regard for aesthetics. For many applications, color is unnecessary, so many sources just don’t bother touching up the colors. It’s totally believable that both images are as-is from their respective sources.
deleted by creator
Usually only the regional imagery sets are from planes, I believe all the global ones are from satellites. But it’s a moot point, the color doesn’t really change the fact that the buildings are completely flattened. No need to prove your credentials 😉
The picture quality is not great either, I don’t think it succeeds in showing the scale of destruction at all





