I was wondering whether that could cause issues for the limited servers available, like when the mass migration from reddit happened. Would it be bad to add more accounts that would be mostly dormant? And if one does create a throwaway would it be better to delete the account afterwards.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If it’s to protect your identity from some embarrassing content you’re afraid of tying with your main account then it’s fine.

    If it’s to skirt the rules of a community or instance then you’re just pushing the instance admins into making it harder for everyone to make throwaway accounts in the future.

  • @Potatos_are_not_friends
    link
    311 year ago

    My stance is if a service is totally cool with 1000+ bots, you making 2-3 accounts a year isn’t a problem.

    The root issue isn’t quantity of accounts, but malicious users causing trouble.

  • Decoy321
    link
    301 year ago

    It would add extra length to the queues for instances that manually approve new users.

  • fiat_lux
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Disclaimer: I am not a Lemmy dev.

    It would add some extra rows to a database, which can increase lookup times if enough people do it with enough accounts… so from a general engineering perspective, I wouldn’t encourage it.

    In a more realistic sense, it would take a lot of people and/or a lot of throwaways to effect much difference. That is, assuming the database queries aren’t too complex or inefficient, and the servers aren’t nearing critical capacity.

    Deleting the account afterwards may not be as effective as never creating the account altogether. There’s a chance some stuff is only tombstoned instead of deleted, things get stuck in caches too, it would probably be better than keeping the dormant accounts though.

    Tl;dr It would be polite of you to keep only a couple of throwaway accounts, but I wouldn’t feel too guilty about making them. Just don’t be like a spam bot and create dozens or more.

  • Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    I think that the impact is rather small. The major issue is actual usage; a dormant account won’t tell the server “please fetch me those resources”, or “please send this comment”, or stuff like this, it’ll be at most a new line in a user database.

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Don’t stress about it. A few extra accounts won’t make any difference. If 1000 people each make 1000 accounts, then you’re starting to have a problem.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I imagine if it becomes an issue for the hosts of the account, they can just delete abandoned accounts, or accounts that havent interacted in some time.

    I have an account in ml and another in lemmyworld. I like ml much more, but created the lemmyworld one when ml was having down times.

    • asudox
      link
      11 year ago

      Yeah, that seems like a good solution.

  • regalia
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I don’t think it’d cost the server much storage or computing power, but it would probably mess up an application queue. Also hopefully the instance does inactive account purges every so often.

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Not really inherently either, it depends on what you do with them IMO.

    • @Macallan
      link
      151 year ago

      Lemmy is older than 2 months.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        What’s with the admin posts then saying “we got two million users in one month” then?

        • olorin99
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          It means that there was a sudden increase from several thousand users over a year or so to 2 million users in a month. Doesn’t mean lemmy started 2 months ago. Just became more popular.

        • cloaker
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Those are instances, some Lemmy instances are much older.