Say No to Palantir in Europe (OP)

I get your sentiment. Palantir is just one of the many in the world providing algorithms & software to detect stuff. Governments use citizens data and tools to detect behavioural profiles and such.

On principle, I object to the use of citizens data. Although I understand that Governments say that they may want to use it to fight “terrorism & crimes” etc like in Germany. Imo, the problem isn’t necessarily people providing information it’s how it’s used like in your examples ICE in USA & Israel ( but also in China etc). Who is to say that changing providers will change the outcome, when he problem is the process or political anti human rights outcome?

For example here’s a longer list of samesuch providers:

What about companies like Intellexa, Candiru, Negg, Cy4gate, DSIRF, PARS, AEGIS (UK) , AggregateIQ (Canada)
Archimedes Group (Israel) , Black Cube (Israel & UK) , Booz Allen Hamilton (US)
Control Risks Group (UK) , Emerdata Limited (UK), Fusion GPS (US), Groupe GEOS (France) , Hakluyt & Company (UK)
Kroll Inc. (US) , NSO Group (Israel)
Oxford Analytica (UK), Palantir Technologies (US) , Pinkerton National Detective Agency (US) , Smith Brandon International, Inc.(US), Stratfor (US), etc.