Wow defending Charlie kirk makes u a Nazi huh? It seems my definition is very fitting lol. If u had read a single fucking book written by high ranking Nazis u would see the clear socialism.
So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let’s apply your logic:
You think the people Charlie spoke to where Nazis.
Because he spoke to them he is therefore a Nazi.
I’m defending Charlie kirk which by your claims makes me a Nazi.
Your having a conversations with me would thus make you a Nazi (by the same logic u used to define Charlie as a Nazi).
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it’s a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I’m glad you’re finally admitting you are pro nazi
Is socialism the only part you look at? Whether they used capitalism or socialism or any other fiscal ism has very little to do with the fact that it was authoritarian and fascist. Kirk was a horrific figure for anyone to support because he supported the same kinds of authoritarian and fascist doctrine that dominated the Nazi regime. This is to say nothing of his promulgating hateful rhetoric regarding anyone that wasn’t a straight white christian male.
Is that clips or is that a fucking text article. Your intentional effort to prevent the full context of any particular quote being seen is a clear manipulation of the facts.
Modlog also full of them being one.
https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=13162145
Including defending Charlie Kirk and saying nazis are actually socialists because they put it in the name 🙃
Lmao this particular sequence of events is pretty funny
I was proud of that one. Even went a made a meme and all.
Wow defending Charlie kirk makes u a Nazi huh? It seems my definition is very fitting lol. If u had read a single fucking book written by high ranking Nazis u would see the clear socialism.
Yes he was one and defending him is defending a nazi.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/02/charlie-kirk-whiteness-turning-points-usa/
Please enlighten us
So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let’s apply your logic:
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it’s a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I’m glad you’re finally admitting you are pro nazi
U are yet to provide a single shred of evidence for this claim. You opinion is backed by nothing but an emotional reaction trained into you.
Again evidence?
I’m not I’m simply showing that ur logic when applied equally makes u a Nazi
Is socialism the only part you look at? Whether they used capitalism or socialism or any other fiscal ism has very little to do with the fact that it was authoritarian and fascist. Kirk was a horrific figure for anyone to support because he supported the same kinds of authoritarian and fascist doctrine that dominated the Nazi regime. This is to say nothing of his promulgating hateful rhetoric regarding anyone that wasn’t a straight white christian male.
My argument was that the national socialist where in fact socialist. I was not and am not defending the rest of their ideology.
Please link me the clips of Charlie supporting fascist Nazi doctrine. Since your so confident this should be very easy.
That’s a load of bullshit: Clip 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OOp4zBkJ14 Clip 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJmcqjP8mhk
If you cared about evidence we wouldn’t be talking and you wouldn’t be defending him.
Here’s a link you’ll ignore and hand wave.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs
Is that clips or is that a fucking text article. Your intentional effort to prevent the full context of any particular quote being seen is a clear manipulation of the facts.
Lawl mmmkay dude. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
I hope u feel comforted knowing that people like me and Charlie Kirk are the ones who are writing the narrative for the next generation.
You’re not. But it’s cute you think you matter so much.