https://archive.is/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/02/huawei-raimondo-phone-chip-sanctions/

“The major geopolitical significance has been to show that it is possible to completely design [without] U.S. technology and still produce a product that may not be quite as good as cutting edge Western models, but is still quite capable.” Miller says a considerable gap remains between SMIC’s capabilities and those of TSMC, the industry leader that produces the newest chips for companies like Apple.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure why anyone ever thought these sanctions were going to stop China from making their own chips. There are over a billion people in China. Of course they’re going to be capable of designing their own chips.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    If you’re currently working for a US semiconductor company, I’m sure there are Chinese companies that would be happy to hire you with a very sizable raise…

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “The major geopolitical significance,” he said, “has been to show that it is possible to completely design [without] U.S. technology and still produce a product that may not be quite as good as cutting edge Western models, but is still quite capable.”

    China’s official broadcaster, CGTN, in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, called the phone Huawei’s “first higher-end processor” since U.S. sanctions were imposed and said the chip it contains was made by Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp., a company partially owned by the Chinese government.

    U.S. sanctions were intended to slow China’s progress in emerging fields like artificial intelligence and big data by cutting off its ability to buy or build advanced semiconductors, which are the brains of these systems.

    “This shows that Chinese companies like Huawei still have plenty of capability to innovate,” said Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University and author of the book “Chip War.” “I think it will also probably intensify debate in Washington on whether restrictions are to be tightened.”

    Willy Shih, an economist at Harvard Business School, said Huawei’s breakthrough was evocative of what happened with Global Positioning System technology, now commonly known as GPS.

    For instance, Intel recently announced it will have to pay $353 million in termination fees to Israel’s Tower Semiconductor after failing to acquire Chinese regulatory approval for the acquisition.


    The original article contains 1,523 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 85%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @LostMyRedditLogin
    link
    21 year ago

    Reading this after watching a video about how the Russian economy is humming along instead of collapsing makes me think there’s a class of people informing Biden that are idiots. Sanctions diplomacy once again accomplishes barely anything. I can’t believe people are getting paid for such shitty advice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Sanctions diplomacy is counterproductive. Globalization worked by making countries too interdependent to fuck around.

      Now? China’s domestic technology capability is growing at an astonishing rate.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      -31 year ago

      The sanctions regime was effective at one time, because America basically had a stranglehold on the world economy. Sure, sanctions never caused a regime change in Cuba or Iran, but those countries were economically devastated and that was the actual goal.

      Things have changed. As dedollarization and multipolarity become dominant, all sanctions are doing is accelerating dedollarization and multipolarity. America is now hurting itself with its sanctions regime as much as its enemies, and it’s only going to get worse.

      China can’t be stopped. 😊