• blargerer
    link
    fedilink
    1981 year ago

    Almost like torture is a really good tool for getting people to talk, and a very bad tool for getting them to tell the truth.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      691 year ago

      Turns out torturers are just really lonely and want someone to talk to

    • @FireTower
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      Torture’s ‘appropriate’ use case is to ask multiple people questions and then compare the results to find commonalities. Torturing one person is essentially useless.

    • @ThePyroPython
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      You should watch The Torture Report with Adam Driver. It’s a very good examination of how torture programs start and then continue due to a need to prove they were justified in the first place.

  • @psycho_driver
    link
    English
    421 year ago

    This guy should have went on to open a chain of sex toy shops.

  • style99
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    Elmo loves torture, and he’s a billionaire so it totally must work great!

    /s

  • qaz
    link
    English
    321 year ago

    As you know, when atoms are split, there are a lot of pluses and minuses released. Well, we’ve taken these and put them in a huge container and separated them from each other with a lead shield. When the box is dropped out of a plane, we melt the lead shield and the pluses and minuses come together. When that happens, it causes a tremendous bolt of lightning and all the atmosphere over a city is pushed back! Then when the atmosphere rolls back, it brings about a tremendous thunderclap, which knocks down everything beneath it.

    Looks legit to me

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      I find it funny that the article says that he mistakenly describes an antimatter bomb, I mean how would he have known about an antimatter bomb?

      For someone who has no idea about nuclear fission, he did a great job at making something up. His imagination was credible enough to safe his life.

      • @jarfil
        link
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Mistakenly by coincidence”, in this case.

        What he really described was… a capacitor. Except for the lead part. And one that would melt itself. But whatever worked.

  • @paddirn
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    “I already told you I don’t know anything about any f*cking setup. You can torture me all you want.”

    “Torture you? That’s a good idea. I like that.”

  • @diocan
    link
    English
    18
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Removed by mod

  • @Chickenstalker
    link
    English
    121 year ago

    Japan would have fought until they all died regardless. The nukes gave the Emperor an excuse to override the military leaders and ordered them to surrender. This satisfied the Japanese code of “honour” because a God told them to commit a disgraceful act of surrender, not themselves. Even then, many still commited seppuku.

    • @WormFood
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      This is a pop culture myth. There was some resistance to the idea of unconditional surrender in the Japanese government (partly because of the emperor), but at the time the bombs were dropped, the Japanese leadership had agreed on surrender as their course of action and were attempting to strike a deal with the Soviet Union to mediate the terms on their behalf.