• @Rotten_potato
        link
        21 year ago

        It’s not about copyright, that’s a burgeois invention. It’s about attribution and alienation, with AI the act of working (creating the images that feed the neural network) is completely decoupled from the product (whatever the giant heap of linear algebra cobbles together). That’s the issue, not some capitalist’s loss of rent-seeking opportunities.

    • @iforgotmyinstance
      link
      English
      -51 year ago

      Stolen how? What specific works are being infringed upon?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I couldn’t name you the specific works this particular piece has blended together, but all AI “art” is made by mashing together actual human work.

        • @HongoBongo
          link
          21 year ago

          As a (bad) hobby level artist, I’m well aware my art is probably best described as mashing together other’s actual human work. But I kind of think that’s true for everyone. You always see influences and borrowed concepts from other’s past works in new art. If your work is posted publicly, you can’t be surprised when another artist sees it and is inspired by it.

          In my opinion, we already have copyright protection against AI art, it’s the same you would use against anyone else. If you can show that the generated artwork is a derivative work, it’s a problem and they’ve violated your copyright.

        • @SCB
          link
          11 year ago

          This is not accurate. AI art is not “mashed together” but rather inherits techniques and creates new images.

        • @iforgotmyinstance
          link
          English
          -6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          K. You just dogmatically believe that this piece was mashed together but can’t name the pieces or which parts are from different works.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            But that is how ai image generators work. I don’t know every piece of art or every photograph ever taken, but I know that ai image generators work by mashing them together.

      • @FireTower
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Any work used to train the AI without first acquiring the proper license from the license holder.

          • @FireTower
            link
            01 year ago

            Here for more accurate results there’s a field on that website where you can specify particular AIs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Just because you didn’t personally steal the goods someone else passed on to you, it doesn’t suddenly make them not stolen goods.

        • @iforgotmyinstance
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          Calling things stolen without evidence does not make them stolen. That’s just kindergarten level finger pointing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            You’re being obtuse. The evidence is the AI itself. It is trained on existing pictures and doesn’t just “dream up some art”. Its all copied and pasted from somewhere. If you actually knew how the tech worked you would know this. But I suspect you actually do and are arguing in bad faith.

            • @iforgotmyinstance
              link
              English
              -21 year ago

              Spoken like someone with no grasp of what AI is and is capable of.

              • @orrk
                link
                01 year ago

                as a comp-sci major: Spoken like someone with no grasp of how AI is and is capable of.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    WOW, didn’t expect the anti work group to be so into capitalism.

    • @orrk
      link
      11 year ago

      This is what happens when people don’t actually read any theory, they think that capitalists working to steal work (art) from workers (artist) is anti-capitalist