The court of appeal overturned the high court’s February ruling and found the government’s proscription of Palestine Action “struck a fair balance”. Harriet Williamson reports.
In her summary the judge called Palestine Action a violent organisation unlike the “peaceful protest” of the suffragettes … seemingly forgetting that the suffragette bombing and arson campaign resulted in the deaths of at least four people and injuries to at least 24 others.
No no you misunderstand what she means by this. The suffragettes were white people defending the freedom of other white people. PA campaigns for brown people so must be vile terrorists.
In her summary the judge called Palestine Action a violent organisation unlike the “peaceful protest” of the suffragettes … seemingly forgetting that the suffragette bombing and arson campaign resulted in the deaths of at least four people and injuries to at least 24 others.
either blatant gaslighting and historic revisionism, or dumb and ignorant. how did she become a judge? wtf
More central to the tactics of the suffragettes when it comes to violence was their use of jiujitsu.
Also hatpins.
No no you misunderstand what she means by this. The suffragettes were white people defending the freedom of other white people. PA campaigns for brown people so must be vile terrorists.
Like, do you not even speak establishment?
(obviously /s)