The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order declaring that children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.

The justices relied on a long-settled understanding of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, and more recent federal laws in ruling that anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions, is a citizen.

  • Sonicdemon86
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The fact that this wasn’t a 9-0 ruling is very concerning. Being a 5-4 ruling on if the 14th amendment means birthright citizenship means a little more money and this could have gone the other way.

  • GreenShimada
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Justices relied on the only possible way that the 14th Amendment makes sense. JFC, It’s a wonder they didn’t trip and fall over their own dicks coming to this bold decision that “oh no shit, the thing we all know what it means still means that.”

    • assembly
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Supreme Court narrowly rules in a stunning 5-4 decision that the ocean does indeed contain water.

        • GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          21 hours ago

          From what I’ve pieced together from a couple different articles, Kavanaugh decided that Trump’s executive order violated federal law but not the Constitution.

          So it was 6-3 to strike down the order but 5-4 that citizenship is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. Kavanaugh thinks that Congress could change that without needing a constitutional amendment.

  • einlander
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    22 hours ago

    What would “temporarily” in America mean? If you extend temporary fat back enough, nobody is a citizen and everybody can be deported.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Temporary” would mean anyone who is not a permanent resident, but is in the country legally. So people on tourist or work visas. “Birth tourism” is a real thing, though nowhere near common enough to be an actual problem that justifies ending birthright citizenship.

      • einlander
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yes birth tourism is a real thing, but I don’t trust this regime to limit the scope of their misdeeds and not weaponize them.

        I can not afford to give them a benefit of the doubt.

        • Steve@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I hate giving them ideas, but they could easilly restrict tourist visas for pregnant women.

          We already cut off asylum for non-whites, remember?

    • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      What would “temporarily” in America mean? If you extend temporary fat back enough,

      mmm… fat back bacon.

  • NatakuNox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    They would then decide people who aren’t Christian are Illegally in the county. Or it’s illegal to be socialist in the us. Or lgbtq…