• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure they don’t invest in search because it’s a poor return on investment. Most people just hit the first page, crank one out, and leave. The next cohort is similarly easily satisfied with their crap search. The people looking for specifics like “big tit short red hair reverse cowgirl pov outdoors at dusk” aren’t profitable enough to spend engineering time on.

    That’s my hypothesis, anyway.

    • TheStaffmaster
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Bing is better for NSFW searches, in my experience, but if you want to be really specific, Yandex with a good VPN might be what you need.

    • P00ptart
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If people would tag their uploads correctly…

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think they have incentives to tag broadly but not accurately so they pick up more visitors. Tag it as “anal” when there’s like a glimpse of butt, and you might get more views from people looking for that. There’s no mechanism to punish inaccurate titles and tagging that I know of.

        • P00ptart
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yeah, I hate that. It’s the same way on ImageFap, which is even more annoying because they don’t even make money off of it.

    • potoooooooo 🥔OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Amen. I don’t even need to click on a video, at this point. Home page is all I need if ya nahmsayin’.