• bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    16 hours ago

    An appropriately sized fine for a corporation?! Well we certainly can’t let that happen.

    Once things go down it’ll be a reduced slap-on-the-wrist to the tune of some millions, and Meta will pay it and continue business as usual.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Goodbye Cuck you won’t be missed is what i’d like to say but someone will bail this piece of shit out at the last second so he can continue his psyops.

    He’s like a turd you can’t flush.

    • zarathustrad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Best we can do is require ID to get on the Internet and embed full tracking of all data in your OS by law. Now, smile for the Government mandated facial recognition camera in your car and on your PC.

      It’s for the the children. Have you thought of them?

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.deOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You know, I agree that the world would be a better place without Meta and its platforms.

      But if governments can do things like this to Meta, they can do it to anyone else too, even to fediverse instances; will admins of instances here be sued next because minors liked to use them too much and they/parents/schools/governments claim those instances are “addictive”? Not looking forward to that world.

      • Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Fortunately, there’s a big difference between Lemmy and Meta social media: no algorithms. Similarly to how reddit worked years ago, you have a page you cater to your needs that displays content based on numeric popularity, not because an algorithm deemed the content to be worth showing. I doubt there’d be much to argue with in court based on that premise alone.

          • justaman123
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah good question, also it would be nice to have like a disinterested button so I could hide items instead of being shown them over and over again. I do tend to go to my all or local page and sort by top for the last 12 hours to get a better mix

            • Druid@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Most apps let you automatically hide posts you’ve looked at previously. I’m not sure if you just need to scroll by or if you need to actively engage with it, but it’s there if you want that

              • P00ptart
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                60 minutes ago

                Lemmy on Voyager has an option to ride read posts but by “read” you either have to click on it or up/downvote.

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There are always algorithms. You literally can’t make software without them. As far as algorithms for choosing which content is displayed, Lemmy still has to have one of those to weight votes vs. age. Is a post that’s +50/-0 from five minutes ago the best to show you, or the one that’s +400/-100 from an hour ago, or the one that’s +1000/-100 from last year?

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Anyone can bring a lawsuit, I don’t see how this would translate to government overreach like you suggest. It’s already illegal to target and harm kids. META got caught doing it. IF a lemmy instance is also doing it I’m fine with them being shut down and fined with similar evidence as is being presented against facebook (loads of internal documents explicitly outlining their strategy, not to mention multiple whistleblowers over the years).

        • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I’m on a lemmy instance dedicated to copyright infringement. Its already been around for years. You have to get quite big to get the government’s intention. Also the site Myrient was just doing endless copyright infringement for years and shut down because it ran out of money, not because the government caught it.

          • justaman123
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Like dedicated to doing copyright infringement? Or like stopping it?

            • pmk@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Encouraging it. “Be Weird, Download a Car, Generate Art, Screw Copyrights, Do Maths”

      • ProbablyUnwise@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well if there’s a fediverse instance methodically and intentionally targeting children, then I think they absolutely deserve to be destroyed. Fortunately, all instances have the ability to defederate, so we don’t need the government to end association with such terrible people.

    • oyo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Guy runs a failed social media company that pivoted into a failed vr company that pivoted into a failed ai company. Why is he a billionaire?

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I hate how dumb this argument is, everyone likes seeing Meta get fined a massive amount, myself included, but this stupid abstinence culture style approach to social media for younger people is really really nauseating.

    We have been through this so many times with so many moral panics and I just want to actually hold these people accountable and have an actual conversation about why kids are miserable which is that… well look up.

    • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s not abstinence culture though?

      If the only offence was providing social media things wouldn’t have gotten this far. There’s plenty of evidence Meta has intentionally optimized their system to damage mental health to increase profit.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Right I mean that they should be punished for doing those things, not for the basic act of providing social media to youth, which I am afraid this will continue to morph into as a moral panic as it is elsewhere in the world like Australia and the UK for example.

        • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s a separate concern. I will point out it’s the same way we treat alcohol, and that direct messaging with friends apps aren’t banned.