California is one of two states, along with Texas, that have passed policies requiring content creators to say if they’ve been paid by a political campaign to post, and the Golden State is considering cracking down by fining people who don’t.

Campaigns have long worked with celebrities and major influencers to win over voters, but now they are teaming up with smaller creators — sometimes with fewer than 100,000 followers — to reach more tailored audiences. That has sparked debates about whether disclosure rules for political advertisements should apply to content creators, who are expected to play prominent roles in the upcoming midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

  • gibmiser
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 month ago

    See where they are going to fuck this up is by saying paid “political” content. Leaves room to try and weasel out of accountability.

    All paid content must be disclosed. If you are being paid by someone to say something then you need to say so. To do otherwise is to lie by omission.

  • SnarkoPolo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    About time someone called out the rampant propaganda online.

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do younger generations really ingest as much YouTube/tiktok/ig influencer data as it sounds like? I feel like I just missed that phenomenon, with YouTube being a thing when I was leaving high school… I never got in the habit of watching YouTube like TV, but it sounds like so many others are addicted to that and short form content.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, and it’s not generational at all. Boomers scroll YouTube shorts and tiktok and take it at Gospel just as much as the younger people do.

      • Funkt4st1c
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes. I dont know a single (gen z) peer who has less than 4 hours screentime daily

      • Pacattack57
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can open up TikTok right now for 5 minutes and see 20-30 ads. In 5 minutes. It has nothing to do with addiction. People are being paid for promotional content and not disclosing that information. People have a right to know when your opinion on a product or person is influenced by money.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Can’t speak for anyone else but I basically only use YouTube for video entertainment anymore. I think basically all tv is middling as fuck and will only watch shit that truly catches my eye, otherwise I’ve got a video playing on my monitors. Note I don’t watch scrolling short form content, it’s basically all trash outside of the occasional meme and needs to be outlawed in my opinion.

  • RememberTheApollo_
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Should be required to say if they are paid by anyone for the purpose of expressing a political view. Not just campaigns.

    • UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Enforcement will happen when the government doesn’t like the content. TikTok gets broken up. Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter keep churning

      • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Even then, they will like it as long as it makes tons of money and the owners keep buying off politicians.

        End money in politics first.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Obviously, they’ll need the normal legislative exclusions for politicians.

      • No1@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Politicians create politicial content and don’t disclose they were paid all the time!

          • Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            The person you’re responding to is pointing to a common corruption in politics, where politicians can receive money (read:bribes) and then shape their political messaging because of it, usually without much actual difficulty or official scrutiny. They’re not saying that the exclusions are actually valuable to the general public.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Let’s start with politicians who don’t disclose they were paid by lobbyists. Making “lobbying” a valid thing means nothing more than systemically approving “payoffs”. God forbid I should hire a writer with a sharp tongue just because I don’t have the wits about me to do so myself.

  • UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Doing a reboot of Police Academy but they’re all investing which CamGirls are being paid in Iraqi Dinar

    • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fucking Iraqi Dinar! My dad was sooooo into that shit! Sold most of it now, but still has some stashed away “just in case it RVs!” 🙄

  • Buffalox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Better claim to be a dis-content creator then.