• JeeBaiChow
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Beyond a certain size, we lose the ability to intuitively understand numbers.

    Examples? Sure:

    1. how many people misunderatood the scale of the undertaking of trying to find mh370 in the ocean without any detailed guidance
    2. how far billionaires are from the average person (i once argued that just having a comfortable home and a computer or cellphone put one comfortably in the top earners in the world - people dont understand the sheer scale of poverty or income inequality as it applies to the global situation)
    3. how only the top ~100 atp/ wta tennis players actually make enough to comfortably cover basic tour costs
    4. how absolutely vast the universe is. Voyager is slightly over a billion km from the earth rn, and it only means it has travelled a light day from the time it was launched

    Feel free to add your own

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      The odds of winning most lotteries vastly exceed getting hit by lightning more than once.

      The Fermi paradox and alien sightings is entirely explained by the inability of the human mind to understand one light year.

  • makeshift0546@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    How many of you could fully explain how a p value is calculated (this may be the wrong sub to put this in, but I’ll let my point stand)?

    How much do you understand about statistics and p-values

    I could tell you how it’s used. I’d have to look up how to calculate it these days. I could tell you that’s a shitty way to get to 67% of something using an ambiguous question that a high schooler could pick apart.

    Shitty questions in, shitty conclusions out 🤷‍♂️

  • SpaceNoodle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If that many admit it, just imagine how many more can’t or won’t.

  • JeeBaiChow
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh, and over 90% of ‘facts’ used in an argument are simply made up.

    • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It is well known that 73% of statistics are made up. /jk

      It’s mental. On one hand, you have people demanding the confidence index for published statistics, otherwise they’re meaningless. On the other hand, you have people that can’t wrap their heads around percentages.