- cross-posted to:
- us_news
- cross-posted to:
- us_news
If you missed this whole saga, here’s a quick rundown. Lebohang Morake, better known as Lebo M, wrote the iconic opening lyrics “Nants’ingonyama bagithi Baba,” which is written in Zulu. Elton John did the music, and Tim Rice wrote the lyrics.
Lebo M sued comedian Learnmore Jonasi for $27 million and accused him of intentionally mocking “the chant’s cultural significance with exaggerated imitations” in a viral podcast clip.
It came after the comedian went on the One54 podcast in February and claimed that the famous chant translates to: “Look, there’s a lion. Oh my God.” The podcast host replied in shock: “You’re joking. That is not what that means! This whole time I thought it was like this like this beautiful, majestic.” The comedian then insisted that was “exactly what it means”.
The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Los Angeles, and Lebo M alleged that Jonasi said the translation “as authoritative fact, not comedy”. They also alleged that the comedian intentionally misrepresented “an African vocal proclamation grounded in South African tradition”.
Lebo M eventually decided to completely drop the lawsuit, but the comedian then demanded that the composer pay him $40k in compensation to cover his legal bills. In the latest update on Friday, 28th August, Judge Josephine Staton granted his request.
What a stupid thing to try and sue someone over holyshit. The arrogance
This left me wondering what the actual English translation is. The one I got is “Here comes a lion, Father.”
Are you telling us this as authoritative fact or comedy?
lol a fact. That is what a translation website told me.
“Look, there’s a lion. Oh my God.”
“Here comes a lion, Father.”
I mean… Given the inaccuracy of translations between languages with completely different grammar and syntax… Those seems like basically the same thing. Definitely within the realm of various online translators giving different responses.
When failing to recognize sarcasm goes horribly wrong.
Even if it was stated as an “authoritative fact”, wouldn’t you need to prove they actually lying (and trying to cause damage) and not just mistaken? Plus what justifies the high amount? How didn’t they just get laughed out of the room by every lawyer they talked to??
How didn’t they just get laughed out of the room by every lawyer they talked to??
Most lawyers do not work on contingency.
Many do not care about being right or wrong as long as they’re getting paid, they’ll file whatever their client wants as long as it isn’t egregious enough to get them outright disbarred.
deleted by creator





