The article’s title covers everything. Slack simply serves as a form of social media for the office that reduces employee productivity.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No it isn’t.

    EDIT:

    OK to explaind on this just a bit. Slack is a Searchable Log of All Conversation and Knowledge. That’s all it is. If all you do is talk shit on there, it’s going to be a repository of shit talking and that’s not slacks fault.

    Personally, slack has saved me a countless amount of time at work. Having a technical problem? Search slack, someone probably asked about it and there’s a solution for that. If there’s no answer, asking in the right channel will usually get it answered pretty quickly.

    Especially as a remote company, slack or a tool like it is pretty indispensable for working with my team. And yes, we talk a lot of shit on there and those conversations happen in shit talking channels which means they don’t clutter the productive channels but I can still bond with my team a bit.

    I guess like any tool, it’s about how you use it. In this case though I don’t think you can blame the tool even though slack is definitely not perfect. It’s definitely far from Facebook, I honestly think you’d win some kind of record with that stretch.

    • eric
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      Tell ‘em Aurenkin!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      If all you do is talk shit on there, it’s going to be a repository of shit talking and that’s not slacks fault.

      perfect. yeah I love slack. people can post their FB shit in #random but the team chat is a great way to get and find answers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I’ve worked at companies where we had great communication policies around slack. Slack rooms were for the room topic, not for conversations.

      There was an off topic room where people could be social and shit talk.

      But basically due to our moderation rules, we really encourage people to keep channels on topic. Which made it more useful, less noisy. So it’s a social network and so far is social people use it. But the structure on top of it is determined by the company policy and the culture

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        You’re really stretching the meaning of “social network” there. May as well say the postal system is a social network.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          its used by people socially, so yes, i think the post office counts as a social network… literally

        • RaivoKulli
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Newspapers had those things where you could chat by sending in mail and having a nickname and shit.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I would never talk shit about anything at work on a medium that keeps a permanent record. Do people really have that hard a time staying professional?

      • @shalafi
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Of course it’s not wise to talk shit on a company platform, but Slack is hardcore about privacy.

        I’m our Slack admin. I cannot see a DM I wasn’t invited to. I cannot even see private channel names that I’m not invited to.

        The only way Slack will divulge private posts, or posts in private channels, is if the account owner contacts support and makes a case for why they need to see anything private.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          The danger in my mind isn’t someone without access, it’s someone with access taking screenshots and using them against you. That’s why I don’t say anything remotely shitty unless it’s on unrecorded audio.

  • @SandmanXC
    link
    English
    731 year ago

    ✅paywall ✅clickbait title

    I’m sure the article makes many salient points.

    • P03 Locke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Slack simply serves as a form of social media for the office that reduces employee productivity.

      JFC, I have not seen such a worse take in many years. The Slack redesign was annoying and I wished Slack would stop making the UI worse each update, but it’s still the lifeblood of our communication chain.

      • Clarke
        link
        English
        121 year ago

        My team communicates through gifs and emoji only

        • 6daemonbag
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          As long as they speak the language I don’t foresee a los on productivity

  • ripcord
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    If you say so. We use it for work really heavily and it’s 99% productive.

  • Eager Eagle
    link
    English
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    None of that is new to Slack. They could’ve written an article to make a decent critique of the questionable UI changes Slack introduced, but instead they targeted features that were already there for years, like reactions and huddle.

    The new interface just wastes space and hides the notification count of unfocused workspaces. I just wish Slack would start making interface changes like these optional.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I agree that the “new” slack(disabling the cross channel thread sidebar) is a big deprecation in functionality. But calling it the “New Facebook” is hilariously absurd

  • @MaxPow3r11
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Every app just copies other apps until they don’t do the thing they were originally “for”.

    & then what’s left is an app that does “everything” very poorly.

    & this is our whole reality now.

    How do we escape?

  • DeadNinja
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Is this article paywalled ?

  • Veraxus
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    This is the stupidest thing I’ve read in weeks. And to be clear, I have read a lot of monumentally stupid nonsense in the last few weeks.

    I’d say more, but @Aurenkin nailed it, so I will defer to their comment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I liked slack when i had it. Microsoft and zoom have been eating some of their market share.

  • @_number8_
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    the collapse of big tech is going to be an interesting watch. seems like every day they’re getting more callous, greedy, overstepping any reasonable bounds…

  • @pavnilschanda
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    I remember suggesting using slack to one of my superiors and they’re like, “What’s Slack?”

  • @tory
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    I’d my work removed slack I am legitimately unsure how I’d communicate with my team at all. During meetings only, in tickets and in github reviews. Nice and clinical. Nah, I’ll keep slack ty