• @Maalus
        link
        211 year ago

        I’d put “none”. Just as “not collecting postal stamps” doesn’t go into the “hobbies” field.

        • pancakes
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          But not collecting postal stamps is one of my favorite hobbies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Exactly. Atheism is simply the lack of belief in a deity; anything extra is just personalized spices.

        • @kautau
          link
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol yeah. “We live in a simulation created and observed by an unpaid intern” vs “we live in a test world where a supreme being keeps changing the rules and then will judge whether you get to live in his resort or the bad hostel once you die”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Atheism is the belief that there are no deities. Atheists have a burden of proof of a negative. Only agnostics get the “not a belief system” card.

        Fight me.

        • @Thranduil
          link
          111 year ago

          Atheism is a lack of belief. Basically we are not convinced there is a god. There is no burden of proof because we are not claiming there isnt a god, just that we are not convinced one does.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I…don’t need to fight you. It’s not about burden of proof; it’s about the definition of the word. Atheism is—as we agree—merely a yes/no classification of the belief in a deity; it is not a belief system in itself. As such, someone can be an atheist while still having a religion, which is a belief system, one that may or may not involve a deity.

          Burden of proof only applies if one is making a claim in an objective context, not when one is making a claim in a subjective context.

          • @Gradually_Adjusting
            link
            English
            101 year ago

            Also worth noting that the onus of proving a claim lies with whoever does claim a thing. It is always more difficult to prove a negative and nobody just assumes everything that hasn’t been specifically debunked. Hilariously wrongheaded of them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Easy, gods used to do devine interventions all the time. Didn’t sacrifice to Neptunus before your sea journey? His mood storm sinks your ship. Didn’t please Mars before your battle? You fight at bad weather and the enemy has surprise reinforcements.

          Modern day gods? They left a secretary or something. Buhbuh you did something bad, I put you on the naughty list but I’m a weak noodle so your punishment will have to wait until after your death. When your soul which is not your body but has all senses asif it were because we antromorph everything, gets hurt.

          If you can bomb a kids hospital without getting struck by lightning, there are no gods. There are millions of people praying for peace and the save return of their children in the ukraine war on both sides, nothing happens. I claim that the presence of a god would be obvious if they took their job description seriously. Like a managers/auditors presence can be felt in the office without seeing him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          You can’t prove a negative.

          Prove to me there isn’t a teapot floating around Saturn, or that Gravity isn’t a panda in the centre of every planet pulling on invisible strings.

          • @panda_paddle
            link
            01 year ago

            Agnostic-atheists are honest. Nostic-atheists are hubristic, fools.

        • @marcos
          link
          -11 year ago

          As always, people use those words with the most absurd meanings linked to them.

          But you are technically correct. What is the best kind of correctness, and all that…

      • @MissJinx
        link
        -21 year ago

        Which is a form of faith based aproach. If you don’t believe in something you believe it doesn’t exist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, if you ask an Atheist if they believe in something spiritual, they would say “no”. They wouldn’t say “I believe that god doesn’t exist”.

          That is like claiming Christians are actually anti-Buddhists since they don’t believe Buddha to exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -51 year ago

      Agnosticism isn’t a religion. Atheism is. You have to have faith to “know” something doesn’t exist with certainty.

      • Bram
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Agnosticism is the view or belief that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable.

        Atheism is an absence of belief in the existence of deities.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          Your definition of atheism is not my experience with pretty much every atheist I’ve ever met. It’s not absense of belief, but belief that God doesn’t exist. There was never anything nuanced about the definition.

          Now we can say absense of belief for the sake of discussion, but then it becomes an issue of semantics, as there is overlap with agnosticism. But it doesn’t match my experience at all. Most atheists will call you names for suggesting anything but the idea that the laws of physics are a complete description of reality. Teenage edgelords mainly.

      • Johanno
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Mhhh well this is a difficult question. Atheists believe there is no God. So there is no point in religion. From a Atheists point of view atheism is not a religion. From a neutral pov you may argue the believe in no God is a religion of its own.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      No no no, I’m a Christian because my parents have shown to me that it’s the one true path.

      • @DoomBot5
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        But it splits 3 ways at the top…

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        And I’m sure it has nothing to do with the fact that it’s the predominant religion where you live and it’s culturally accepted as true lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    271 year ago

    Isn’t that what basically happens when you’re born? I seriously wonder how many Christians would be such if they were born in India or China.

    • @Godric
      link
      151 year ago

      Nah the sorting hat takes in to account who you are and who you might be. Religion us mostly based on geography.

      • @kautau
        link
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agreed, though there is an argument to be said where your parents will raise you in a specific way, based on their upbringing, and therefore your nature could decide your house. Malfoy was a slytherin because his parents were, and that’s all they brought him up to be, which isn’t unlike religion, where being raised in a specific way will decide your outlook on the world

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    No Satanism, Pastafarianism or Wiccan on the list? >:(

    Considering sports and religion always go out of control with large crowds, I bet the Quidditch matches would end up in massacres too frequently

    • @Thranduil
      link
      81 year ago

      Ist satanism just atheism with extra steps?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        That’s the us ngo satanic temple, you also have people who religiously worship satan instead of jesus. Christian multiverse. High chance of encountering cults if you look for them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            A cult may or may not include a religion.

            A cult is also typically closed off to the general public (secret or keeps a low profile on purpose). Some cults also isolate their members from the rest of the general population.

            You sure have overlaps between cults and religions, but they are not the same.

            • The Dark Lord ☑️
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              My question was rhetorical, but I didn’t make it obvious. Most religions isolate their members, but it just depends how much.

              My point is that most religions are culty, it’s just a matter of how much.

              Sometimes it’s so hard to tell the difference that one must ask themselves whether there is one. Are religions just normalized cults?

    • @kautau
      link
      61 year ago

      sorting hat scrunches it’s face

      HUFFLEPUFF!

  • Dr. Coomer
    link
    51 year ago

    Know I’m thinking it just starts letting out prophecies, not answering the question of what religion you get, but rather telling stories of horror about the non-existence of God and yet the ever fleeting reality we are yet to experience.