• @gsfraley
    link
    281 year ago

    Note that this is likely a good thing, the new maps are being drawn by a special master to give black folk more representation. The “state” that’s objecting here is Alabama lawmakers.

  • Hairyblue
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    This is good news. Republicans hate democracy, so they are not going to like it.

    Everyone be sure to vote.

    • worldwidewave
      link
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Very different cases. WI’s case is clear as day, unless Republicans pull some chicanery and impeach a justice before she takes the bench.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Not sure about WI, but it definitely could affect GA, LA, and TX since they all have large Black populations.

      • @RojoSanIchiban
        link
        101 year ago

        There’s a case for Florida in the pipeline too. They gerrymandered out a predominantly black district for '22.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the drawing of a new Alabama congressional map with greater representation for Black voters to proceed, rejecting the state’s plea to retain Republican-drawn lines that were struck down by a lower court.

    In refusing to intervene, the justices, without any noted dissent, allowed a court-appointed special master’s work to continue.

    On Monday, he submitted three proposals that would create a second congressional district where Black voters comprise a majority of the voting age population or close to it.

    The judges said Alabama lawmakers deliberately defied their directive to create a second district where Black voters could influence or determine the outcome.

    Black voters overwhelmingly favor Democratic candidates, and white Alabamians prefer Republicans.

    The state had wanted to use the newly drawn districts while it appeals the lower-court ruling to the Supreme Court.


    The original article contains 358 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!