The recent transformation of the state’s election laws explicitly enabled citizens to file unlimited challenges to other voters’ registrations. Experts warn that election officials’ handling of some of those challenges may clash with federal law.

  • worldwidewave
    link
    88
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Trying to erroneously remove someone’s ability to vote needs to be a crime. This is denying citizens their sovereign rights, and people need to be held accountable when this is done fraudulently.

  • @TheJims
    link
    391 year ago

    The Republican war on free and fair elections will never end.

  • @books
    link
    271 year ago

    Just for the record. Dems can do this too. Guarantee some of these trumpets have a lake home and a real home and it would be pretty easy to challenge residency.

    Assuming that their challenge law is simple, which if someone challenged 100,000 voters it kinda seems to be.

    Fyi. Someone tried this in Montana in the 2000s and was chided out of court.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      If there’s no penalty for false challenges, Democrats should challenge every Republican registration.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Fuck that. Let’s run a script to programmatically file challenges for all Republican voter registrations. If they really want to play this game, I am down to clown, motherfuckers.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Republican majority board, if they could guess who’s who from where the challenges come from they might just game it anyway

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      In light of the fact that the US has no national ID, and the Constitutional ban on poll taxes, combined with the requirement individual states run their own elections, registration is the best option there is.

      We need a way to ensure people are eligible to vote, and a way to ensure people only vote once. A big list of “people who can vote” is the answer.

      That said: getting on the list should be easy. Removing someone from the list should be hard.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I feel like this is under-thinking it a bit, but bear with me:

        Birth certificate: Added to the list.

        Death certificate: Removed from the list

        Then it’s just a matter of checking age and voting in the correct precinct.

        • @candybrie
          link
          61 year ago

          Except people move states. Or voting districts within a state. So you have to be on the right list after you move.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Birth certifications and death certifications aren’t universal. There’s plenty of cases where someone doesn’t have a birth certificate, or a death certificate is issued in error, while the individual is still eligible to vote.

          And, as a general thought experiment: How many people live in the same state, much less voting precinct, when they turn 18 that they did when they were born? How do you track that?

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Oh yeah the same state with the illegitimate republican governor that oversaw his own election.

    Theyre all about the sanctity of elections

  • @books
    link
    101 year ago

    Usually isn’t any penalty.

    I also did a quick Google search and it looks easy AF.

    Just need money to buy the datasets and rudimentary SQL knowledge to run a query.

  • @HoustonHenry
    link
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder who opened that loophole?

    Edit- /s