• GabuBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just realized that going up in flames and going down in flames are both very bad.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The opposite of skeletons in your closet is no skeletons in your closet, not skeletons in the front yard. LOL

    • mozingo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      He said “Idiom continuity”. That doesn’t mean they all have to be opposites, he’s just extending the metaphors in whatever direction he fancies.

  • fidodo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    “going sideways” is also bad. I guess the moral of that idiom is that directions are bad?

    I guess “going forwards intact” would be the good version.

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      “going sideways” is also bad.

      “Going forward in flames” is what it should be. You’re in flames, but you’re not going up, down, or sideways (all bad), but just going forward knowing the flames will probably subside.

    • ma11en
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      If someone ‘lets the cat out of the bag’ they have shared secrets.

  • ChlorineAddict
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I kinda want us to make “hold the towel” a thing. I like it

      • elegantgoat1
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, I can buy that. My thought was that there is no spectrum here though. Just two points.

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it’s continuity, like a spectrum. At one end is thin ice, the other is thick ice. etc

      • elegantgoat1
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, I think that’s wrong. Since they are discrete and not a continuum. Since there are only two extremes.

        If his new relationships were true it would make the opposite idioms consistent with their non-opposite counterparts. Kind of the same concept as a contrapositive proposition, i.e. ‘if A then B’ implies ‘if not A then not B’.