• ChicoSuave
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    The ultimate point of capitalism is to receive money for nothing. Shrinkflation is just the natural next step until a final subscription service for a wait-list spot to receive when the next batch of product is released.

  • FlickOfTheBean
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Yeah, innovation to rip you off in new and interesting ways

    • hark
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’ve seen the argument made in complete seriousness that it’s better for portion control so that people don’t overeat, particularly when it comes to fast food portions.

  • isendmemes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 years ago

    So with shrinkflation, what’s the long term goal here? I mean, at some point you can’t make the product any smaller right? Surely we won’t be paying $75 for one microscopic piece of flour… right…?

    • Wilzax
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 years ago

      They introduce a bigger size later until they phase out the pitifully small one

    • funky_tomatoe@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      At some point they reintroduce bigger sizes again while keeping the previous price. They can then go back to decreasing the size of the new big pack that is more expensive than the old big pack.

  • Hominine
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I refuse to buy from brewers using slim cans. Come at me beer nerds.