Throwing your life’s work down the crapper because she wanted to hold on to power. She took Roe v. Wade with her to the grave and set the feminist movement back to the 1950s.
I mean literally if she had retired during Obama administration we likely wouldn’t be in the same mess. Can directly blame her for the loss of roe vs Wade.
Potentially. A SCOTUS seat opened when Obama was in office, but Republicans actively prevented it from being filled.
A great Innuendo Studios video about this behavior: https://youtu.be/MAbab8aP4_A
The pressure campaign for RBG to retire was when democrats still held a senate majority with 53 seats. Republicans blocked Obama’s SCOTUS appointment when they held the senate majority. In 2016, republicans simply just didn’t allow a vote to happen because the senate leader sets the vote schedule. The nuclear option had already been invoked by that very same dem caucus on all other presidential nominations too.
The scenarios look similar on a surface level but in the details that matter they are leagues apart. If RBG had retired in 2013 or (most of) 2014, her replacement would been confirmed, barring a Kavanaugh-sized scandal. Either republicans would have provided the seven votes needed to secure cloture, or Reid would have invoked the nuclear option to lower the cloture requirement on SCOTUS nominees to a bare majority, like all other positions. Either way the nominee would have been confirmed.
Well said. There’s a reason why pride is one of the seven deadly sins.
Like most elderly politicians these days, she waited too long to retire and left us with a mess.
Make sense that the USPS made it a forever stamp. You to can hold on to power (to mail a letter) forever!
Is the stamp “ROE v WADE” chisled on a tombstone?
Democrats should pack the courts, should have been a day 1 assignment for Biden. No reason not to after the bullshit they pulled with Obama and then reversed stance on with Trump.
I agree they should pack the court, but also congress has impeachment power and several of the justices have been proven to not follow ethical rules. Not to mention the credible SA allegations and the illegitimacy of depriving Merrick Garland a vote and giving to Gorsuch. Finally, Congress could also just enshrine Roe into law and could have at any time done so and they didn’t so I blame Congress more than anybody
When did they have the votes to enshrine Roe? And please be specific about dates and do a little research first.
Ouch. Hit with your own projection. Roe vs wade was passed in 1973. By a Republican majority supreme court. Immediately after it’s passage and for more than the next decade Republicans Or democrats either one could have easily passed it into law. But they didn’t. Only in the 1980s with the Resurgence of fascism frightening democrats for all the wrong reasons. Did the Trope of the timid stand for nothing Democrat and the dumber than dirt anti-abortion Republican Trope come into existence.
By the 1990s it would have started becoming slightly hard to have passed it into law but was still doable. But they didn’t do it. The fashionably fascist Republicans did not have an interest in it since it would not expand their power. And the timid stand for nothing Democrats dare not. Because they saw how handily they were beaten by the fascist in 1980. But that still 20 plus years that it could have been passed to wide legislative and public support.
It was never about the votes, it was them not wanting to give up their fundraising cash cow by selling fear that republicans would take it away. Since they never acted when they had the chance, it was taken away.
Nice job not answering the question
Since RvW they had about 7 combined years to pass it when they had a supermajority.
The Democrats had a fillibuster proof majority for a whopping 72 days and they passed the ACA and Patient Protection Plan.
And during that same period they found the time to pass 161, mostly pointless, other laws. But nothing for the law Obama promised to sign day one.
Cool - you answered the question, gold star. Here’s one more - in those 7 years, was there ever a call from the public to put RvW into law? I’ll even settle for ONE call-to-action news article from that time period.
One nobody who wrote the sentence “they should make RvW into the law” while the dems had a supermajority and I’ll say you have a point
I mean it would have been redundant up until the court decided that settled law didn’t actually matter. When they had a supermajority row vs wade was a constitutionally protected right, there was no reason to spend the political capital on “settled law”.
There were multiple calls from legislators with big promises to codify it.
Narrator: they never had the fucking chance.
If Democrats actually did their job in Congress we wouldnt need to rely on SCOTUS as much,
It should be done, but Biden has never had the opportunity.
The size of SCOTUS is set by statute, and would need a law passed by the house and senate to do so. Democrats don’t hold the house today, but did in the prior congress. That vote likely could have succeeded. It would have failed in the senate. At the time the senate was 50-50 and I cannot possibly imagine any scenario where Manchin and Sinema would have voted for that law. King and Feinstein wouldn’t have been certain votes either, but likely winnable if it came down to the wire. Even if all of them did vote aye, regular legislation can be filibustered and there is definitely 0% chance that Manchin+Sinema would have voted to kill the filibuster.
Dems need a house majority and at least a 52-48 senate majority for this to happen. I suspect that rage has already faded enough that it won’t happen even then, barring SCOTUS doing more Dobbs sized awful decisions.
Supreme Court was never meant to take cases. Overturn Marbury v. Madison.
We kinda have to wait for the justices to either retire or die off, for better or for worse.
We should all remember Ruth Bader Ginsberg, a woman who fought so hard for so many people’s rights and yet was willing to undo all that for the sake of her own pride.
Honestly fuck her Crazy old bat
And fuck any asshole who doesn’t stop aside when they’re geriatric and senile and access over the entire nation because of their own arrogance
The one good thing is that it sticks around an extraordinarily long time.
“The USPS went on to say they’re ready to release the stamps but they’re waiting for just the right time.”
/s
Should not celebrate someone who did insane damage to our democracy.
Removed by mod
woof. You’d think they would have gone with a more flattering photo/image. Not one reminiscent of Gollum.
She does not deserve anything more than this.
Be careful: eagle, goblin, and troll references to Jewish facial features have long been considered antisemitism. Just FYI.
Gollum is a hobbit, so it’s all good.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“Now a new stamp will honor this outstanding American eminent jurist who gave so much to our country as a scholar, teacher, lawyer, judge and justice,” Supreme Court Justice John Roberts said in opening remarks at the National Portrait Gallery.
The stamp features an oil painting of Ginsburg wearing her black judicial robe and white collar.
“Of the many honors my grandmother has received, this stamp is especially fitting and not only because the Supreme Court has had occasion to interpret the postal clause found in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution,” Spera said.
Roman Martinez IV, the chairman of the USPS Board of Governors, said the stamp honors not only Ginsburg, but in effect, the Supreme Court as well.
Pointing out USPS receives thousands of suggestions each year for new subjects, Martinez said the postal service is “proud” to be issuing a stamp in her honor.
Nina Totenberg, an American legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio, said she interviewed Ginsburg dozens of times throughout the years.
The original article contains 424 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 60%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Fuck that cunt piece of shit.
Your mother
