• Denvil
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Whats the difference between these two, is food security secure access to any food, while nutritional security is access to the food necessary to meet all nutritional needs?

  • @TeenieBopper
    link
    231 year ago

    Isn’t nutrition security kind of implied? Like, is there someone who’s like giving away 2200 calories a day in twinkies and ho-hos being like “aha! Gotcha! You just said ‘food’ not ‘healthy food!’” like some sort of lawful evil djinni? The movement to combat food deserts is to get actual grocery stores so that people have access to fresh fruits/vegetables instead of just the processed food available at dollar stores.

    • @Red_October
      link
      161 year ago

      OP just wants to embrace semantics to try to feel superior. Just like everywhere else in their life, we’re all just rolling our eyes and wishing to the heavens they would shut up.

      • @SoftScotch
        link
        41 year ago

        Thank you for saying it. I’m browsing c/memes for a laugh, not whatever this is.

  • @robocall
    link
    181 year ago

    No one can force me to take vitamin d supplements!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    If it were legitimate, “let them eat cake” could be interpreted as a sensible plan. The peasants have no bread? We have cake. Let them have some.

    • @Ddhuud
      link
      241 year ago

      In the original phrase, the word used was not “cake”, it was “brioche”, which is a kind of French toast. And the thing is you still need bread to make brioche.

      The phrase often but wrongly attributed to Marie Antoinette, alludes to the ignorance of everyday matters from the ruling class that are too rich to even know how to tie their own shoes.