You must log in or register to comment.
Seems straightforward to me. It’s pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It’s also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.
Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.
I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.
But your honour it would be devastating to our case!
I think it would depend on what they’re trying to charge him with.
Clowvnoy organizers fucked around and now don’t want to find out. FTFY
I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.
Okay, I don’t: they should know better.
