British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.::The British Museum is digitizing its entire collection of more than eight million pieces, at a total cost of over $12 million. This move was announced after the museum experienced a theft back in August.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    Only 12 million? Sounds like a steal. The British museum has everything. That’s really good

  • @totallynotarobot
    link
    English
    371 year ago

    The thefts weren’t recent, they started stealing that collection decades ago.

    • @sramder
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Higgs is suspected to have taken uncategorized items and selling them on the e-commerce website eBay. One item worth $64,000 was offered for online auction for as little as $51 and listings for artifacts from the museum’s collection appeared online as early as 2016, according to a report in the Telegraph.

      • @totallynotarobot
        link
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The stealing I meant was the British Museum’s acquisition of the collection, but this too.

        • @ilikekeyboards
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.

    • Blue and Orange
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Lol that was my first thought when I read this too. Nonetheless, there’s zero chance of any of the historical artifacts being repatriated to their countries of origin now. It’s a big loss.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    So the museum famous for stealing its artifacts is complaining about said stuff being stolen from them?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Why is the cost a problem. 12 mill might be a lot of money for like, some guy, but the government is responsible for the artifacts and deal with national budgets in the trillions.

    If they dont want to pay for security storage and backups, send the peices back to their countries of origin. Maybe they can find some way of protecting history, cause England sure doesn’t want the responsibility

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    After they’ve scanned it all will they be returning it to the countries they stole them from?

    • Cave
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Of course not. People can’t be trusted to take care of their own historical artifacts. Britain will take better care of them. If they want to see it, they can just pay to fly across the world to see them. It’s surely better this way.

        • @jaybone
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          We can’t do it because it’s against the law that we made that says it’s illegal.

        • Cave
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          deleted by creator

        • @PeachMan
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Sure, but I don’t see any of the leadership at the museum advocating against that law.

          • @fubo
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Where have you checked?

            • @PeachMan
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Where should I check?

              • @fubo
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You could write them a letter and ask, I suppose?

                It’s dishonest to say “I don’t see X” when you haven’t made any effort to look for X.

  • Orionza
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    $12 million - a bargain for digitizing the collection for eternity.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    Why the fuck is anyone writing an article about $12M dollars?

    Do people not understand what rich people make from passive investments? Literally just repurpose a single rich person’s passive investment and you can pay to digitize a library’s worth of artifacts every year for eternity.

    Society is absolutely fucked in the head if anyone is allowed to build a yacht without getting crowbarred in the back of the calf while we’re considering whether or not “we can afford to pay” to preserve priceless historical artifacts.

  • @cheese_greater
    link
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cost of securing your intangibly and financially valuable physical assets for all time and ease of “sharing” losslessly with other museums?

    Priceless.

  • @moipe
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    A virtual version of the museum in 2029? What would be the point in going? I can look at a picture of a picture on the internet for free.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get what you mean, like there’s definitely some stuff you can just look at a picture of it on the internet, but I guess for others it’s about the sense of space, connection, grouping, narrative, context etc that’s present with a well put together Museum or Gallery display.

      Without all that, you’ve just got a car boot sale of random things - wheras the text, maps, illustrations, audio, video or 3d recreations etc that sits alongside - or simply the placement of things next to one another, or following through the room in a particular order is what really makes that stuff interesting.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    It only took a couple hundred years for them to respond to all the theft they did? Better late than never I guess.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    What does it cost? How much of their collection?

    I just read it 3 times in the feed, first post title, then preview of link, then op comment :D