• @RegalPotoo
    link
    English
    831 year ago

    Good that you’ve put the work in to compile your list, but for anyone new; this is a list of C-tier hosts, and seems to have a pretty strong focus on “privacy” hosts - some of the privacy features can be nice, but it can be a double edged sword. By using a privacy focussed host, you end up co-habitating with other privacy focussed users, which tends to have a higher-than-average concentration of sketchy or outright criminal users. This can have an impact on IP reputation and other operational issues, even if you aren’t doing anything sketchy yourself

  • @essteeyou
    link
    English
    581 year ago

    VPS hosting coparison if all you care about is crypto support.

  • key
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    “cock box” they sound… Reputable.

    • nek0d3r
      link
      English
      411 year ago

      tbh GoDaddy looks sussy too if you didn’t know better lol

      • @RegalPotoo
        link
        English
        621 year ago

        And if you do know, they are even more sketch

        • netburnr
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Their vos price isn’t bad, but keep in mind no refunds if you buy a year of service.

          • @RegalPotoo
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            Non-refundable registration fees are standard in the industry; I was referring to their notoriously predatory “extra add-ons” that they hard-sell on people. Also, in my experience, they are easily 25-50% more expensive

      • @BloodSlut
        link
        English
        181 year ago

        Their older TV ads didnt help

        • nek0d3r
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Oh no, I didn’t even know those existed

          Oh they’re terrible

          Thanks I hate it

  • AWildMimicAppears
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That guy again… I just repost what i commented last time:

    after looking around on that site, i deeply mistrust the original author about probably everything. using the search term “christchurch shooting was faked”
    and arguing that the search results attack conspiracy theories, which means that there is censoring going on - that does not fit my definition of sanity.

    e: ah, and the moon landing was fake and covid shots are evil. dudes, this guy is nuts, dont even take the time of the day from him.