- cross-posted to:
- weirdway
- cross-posted to:
- weirdway
A place for more casual conversation about subjective idealism and its implications.
You must log in or register to comment.
“Discussion Thread”
Originally posted by u/Scew on 2021-07-02 02:04:36 (oboxqh).
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 03:54:01 (h3txuet)
This is an interesting perspective. I see your logic as a cloud of ideas.
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 22:47:28 (h3wyog8)
Beautifully put.
Originally commented by u/EdwardArtSupplyHands on 2021-07-29 13:07:51 (h6wvlyv)
This is it. Thanks.
Originally commented by u/Calculating_1nfinity on 2021-07-13 07:37:02 (h4yu7fd)
Exactly
Originally commented by u/riceandcashews on 2021-07-09 01:43:53 (h4hgdg4)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-02 11:54:06 (h3r799f)
What are its implcations? Haha :)
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 07:34:09 (h3urzr9)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 11:51:14 (h3vl2hz)
Oh… this one seems more logical than to say mind is king. Maybe mind is a puppet king. Even if experience is mental activity, it doesn’t necessitate mental governance. That is an additional assumption.
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 22:29:49 (h3wx688)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 22:39:05 (h3wxy41)
The agency points at *subjective ideation* and that is not necessarily dependent on the mind.
Where’s the line from solipsism and mental subjective idealism in the description?
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-04 06:01:24 (h3yaxpx)
This seems like a bit of a reduction, what difference are you pointing to that “simply mental activity” is not the same thing as “mind” itself?
Originally commented by u/Scew on 2021-07-08 02:23:10 (h4dam0q)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 11:31:42 (h3vj0t8)
Hmmmmm…
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 22:28:26 (h3wx26s)
The problem with SI is it is in many ways quite simple and once you’ve got it there’s not a ton to talk about, but there is a lifetime of work in taking that intellectual realization and making it more than just a shallow intellectual realization.
That’s one perspective anyway
Originally commented by u/riceandcashews on 2021-07-09 01:46:26 (h4hgq1b)
I’d be most interested in having a wider scope of understanding that to which the term “subjective idealism” refers beyond its situation within philosophical contexts.
After all, these physical setups are pragmatic. I value that in it. We call it magick. Or, lucidity.
I think each perspective has a unique formulation for what “it” is. Now, I’m not asking about each one’s secret version, that’s awfully familiar.
Oh, you know what. I just got it. That’s what “subjective idealism” is…a way to discuss “it” without exposing the subject itself to unnecessary vulnerability.
This is not to imply that there is a danger but hey, subjects have values and some may value this or that less or more.
Cool thanks for reading, got close to the curb at the end there, in driving home the point.
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-02 23:07:42 (h3stoos)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-02 23:33:19 (h3swpdg)
What is the wider scope of understanding ?
What are you asking? I’m talking about the juice. You don’t got it.
What are the physical setups and how they are pragmatic ? What do you mean by pragmatic ?
Woah. Have some authority for your self. I didn’t post my comment to attract servants.
What do you mean by vulnerability ?
What do you mean by subjective idealism?
Agree
Haha, yes, I do in fact agree with my self. It’s good.
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 01:12:41 (h3ta2ja)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 01:28:29 (h3tcbml)
All is mind and all is mental. Reality is made of my mental commitments.
Do you see, then, how asking me to define your mental commitments is subservience?
Or do you dare to request that I exert myself for an internet stranger “Simple_Ad_3”?
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 01:49:46 (h3tfdv5)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 01:52:46 (h3tfuej)
Ah…
Yes there is that sort of issue with having “casual” conversation…this subreddit (scratching head)
The thing is for me that the mind of most others is boring and useless. I see they wait a lot for “mental changes” they don’t acess the full benefits of this life to gain themselves the most power. Power of imagination, stuff like that, principles and trans-lifetime knowledge.
At least if they are useless, they could be interesting or inspirational, or stimulating in some way, perhaps innovative. Then I can use it in my own style because I have enough imagination to do it. Mainly though, where’s the use? I prefer substance instead of frills, usually.
This is casual conversation for me. This is my first life in-carnata so I’m enthusiastic about going beyond the limits of physical form and to experience a good foundation in my knowledge for following lifetimes, if I go incarnata again.Wbu? What’s your intrigue with mental ideation, weird ways, etc etc (or whatever is your model of understanding? I really don’t know what the popular stuff is these days, been doing my own thing for a while lol )
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 07:21:37 (h3uqf04)
[deleted]
Originally commented by u/[deleted] on 2021-07-03 11:27:07 (h3vij6y)