CNN’s Wolf Blitzer seemed at a lost of words at the justification being used to bomb a refugee camp in Gaza.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    451 year ago

    I hate how articles like this don’t link the actual video.

  • @pensivepangolin
    link
    English
    421 year ago

    It’s almost as if, and hear me out guys, ISRAEL ARE NOT THE GOOD GUYS HERE.

      • @pensivepangolin
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        The civilians of Gaza, clearly and inarguably. They have been living for decades under aerial surveillance, need IDF permits to even visit a hospital outside Gaza, which is often necessary as the hospitals within Gaza have been under supplied for years. They also had the Israeli army only allow food imports sufficient to keep the population just above starvation levels. And the whole time, armed Israeli “civilians” have been forcibly evicting Palestinians from their homes in land to which Israel has no claim under international law.

        To argue that a violent reaction to that kind of life makes anyone morally blameworthy is callous, bigoted, inhumane, and plainly wrong. If you think that, honestly, I am sorry for you.

    • CrimeDad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Wolf sucks. The IDF guy is admitting to mass murder right in front him and everyone. No self-respecting journalist would let it slide like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        301 year ago

        What do you mean “Let it slide”? He repeatedly pressed the guy on the point. He cut the spokesman off when he tried to change the subject. He stayed on the point about Isreal bombing innocents for as long as he reasonably could, and refused to accept any of the evasive and weasely answers the spokesman tried to give him.

        What exactly do you want here? For him to scream at the guy, call him a murderer, tell him he’s going to burn in hell? That’s not journalism, that’s self-indulgence. Wolf was doing exactly what a good journalist should do, trying to get to the truth of the story, and he only gave up when he’d gotten as far as he could from this particular avenue.

        • CrimeDad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          He could have questioned the certainty that a specific Hamas guy was even present in (or under, I guess) the camp in order to make the admission of guilt more specific. For example: https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1719572283436782057?t=UM-uSl5z89Ua4uaw0p2-xw&s=19

          Other follow up questions might include “who specifically ordered the airstrike?” and “if you wanted to minimize civilian casualties, why conduct an airstrike on a refugee camp at all?”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            And those follow up questions may well have been asked, if they hadn’t lost sound on the call. But regardless of how you think you might have handled it, there was nothing wrong with the angle Wolf took here. He kept the focus squarely on the horrific nature of the decision and refused to let the guy weasel out of it.

      • @SkyezOpen
        link
        181 year ago

        “There was a hamas commander so we dropped a giant bomb on a refugee camp full of women and children.”

        “It sounds like I’m hearing you dropped a bomb on a refugee camp full of woman and children to kill a hamas commander.”

        “No. Uhh, tunnels. Complicated situation.”

        • CrimeDad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Wild to watch this CNN elder short circuit because he can’t figure out how to make the narrative fit.

        • CrimeDad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          To me it seemed like he was struggling to give the IDF guy an out and make it fit the narrative.

  • @Substance_P
    link
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not sure if it seems like the headline claims, but in my case, from what I saw, Wolf had a cutout over the satalite feed, maybe on purpose? I hate it when the video isn’t added in the article.

  • @Grapetruth
    link
    11 year ago

    It’s “at a loss for words”, not “at a lost of words”.

    CNN’s Wolf Blitzer seemed at a loss for words at the justification being used to bomb a refugee camp in Gaza.