• flipht
        link
        fedilink
        2511 months ago

        100%. Most business is just advanced sophistry at this point. Marketing and advertising serves a useful purpose for new products, when the market isn’t aware that it exists.

        But by quantity and cost, most advertising is just social manipulation and is effectively an extra drain on the economy.

    • danielfgom
      link
      English
      611 months ago

      Juan, YOU are the man! 💪

      Plus people forget that if they use iCloud Apple can also see all your data in the same way Google can if you use a Google account

        • danielfgom
          link
          English
          211 months ago

          Only to say it’s the same with Google. The data is also encrypted. So they want to point the finger and say how much Google collects, but so do they.

        • danielfgom
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          I’m sure the Google is also encrypting the data with the exception of the interoperable data. So there’s no difference. Why point fingers when Apple do the same?

          Apple also know your browsing history. They also know your app usage. They also store your contacts, calendar, photos - just like Google. I don’t see the difference.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Apple already can’t look at most of your data. Advanced Data Protection makes it so they can’t see any of it.

  • @TheGrandNagus
    link
    English
    13611 months ago

    Apple is 100% correct. It’s the entire reason Android exists.

    Then again, Apple also does a fair bit of data collection. I hate that Apple has been able to market themselves as some kind of bastion of privacy. They aren’t.

    • @woelkchen
      link
      English
      5511 months ago

      Apple is 100% correct. It’s the entire reason Android exists.

      Then again, Apple also does a fair bit of data collection. I hate that Apple has been able to market themselves as some kind of bastion of privacy. They aren’t.

      So Apple is not 100% correct. They are 50% correct because the second half of their claim is that Apple is somehow different and not tracking its users…

      • Jolteon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1211 months ago

        When the pot calls the kettle black, it is technically correct.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1811 months ago

      Actually, the reason Android exists isn’t so one-dimensional.

      • The company Android was initially concerned more with Microsoft dominating phones like they did computers at the time, before being bought by Google
      • They created two prototype chains initially, one touch, one that was more akin to BlackBerry
      • iPhone came out, they ditched the BlackBerry-esque one and focused on what became now Android

      Google was mostly just doing what all tech companies were doing at the time, trying to compete in a mobile arms race for dominance. The data tracking was just a bonus. Appeasing shareholders is paramount. Look at how Apple created an Alexa speaker just because they had to as another example of this type of behavior.

      Also, Apple actually has a long history of tracking user behavior that predates both Android and the iPhone.

      Apple apps since some time shortly after the inception of OS X would (and likely still do) phone home to configuration.apple.com to send apple metrics on usage. Earlier variations of LittleSnitch could actually block this collection behavior.

      Apple has since reconfigured the network stack to guarantee that direct encrypted connections to Apple are always possible above any VPN, or other type of network filter connection. So there’s no way to prevent communication with Apple on an Apple product at all now short of keeping it off the Internet or blocking DNS to 17.* IP addresses, which would only work on a network one has control over.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      I believe the reason Google acquired Android was to make sure that Apple didn’t dominate the mobile device landscape, which would be a threat to their ad business. The data collection was just a nice side-effect, from their perspective.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        911 months ago

        I think you underestimate how early Google acquired Android. In 2005, Apple wasn’t even in the mobile device market. Nokia were the dominant handset in those days.

        • folkrav
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          This. If anything, they wanted to claw back some of that Blackberry market. Apple wasn’t even on anybody’s mind yet on the mobile side of things.

    • @Eldritch
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      All cell phones are tracking devices. Unless you faraday cage them. But yes, both apple and Android phones give out way more information than just that. And I definitely would not say that I would trust Apple more with data that I would Google.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Genuine question: in what ways do Apple track iOS users (that cannot be turned off)?

      I’m of the viewpoint that most tracking can be rather easily be turned off, and that android plays in a totally other ballpark here. But I might very well be wrong.

    • @Melco
      link
      English
      3211 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        What do you mean by get pretty close?

        Having to log into a Google account that uniquely identifies you across all your devices and milks you of every single data it can put its filthy hands on?

        I am an android user but honestly between the two I think Apple is the lesser evil

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          (If you buy a suitable device) You don’t have to use the preloaded OS (see Graphrne, Lineage etc).

        • @Melco
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Yup, the logic people use to call Apple phones secure would put Fisher Price toy phones at the S-Tier of security.

  • @Substance_P
    link
    English
    6911 months ago

    Is Apple trying to convince me that the Health app, Apple maps or Siri doesn’t track me?

    • @woelkchen
      link
      English
      3011 months ago

      Is Apple trying to convince me that the Health app, Apple maps or Siri doesn’t track me?

      No, they are trying to convince themselves. It’s an internal brainwashing presentation after all, not for external PR.

    • ijeffOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2011 months ago

      Their slide seems to list Siri, Maps, and iAd not being tied to the user’s Apple ID as a pro. I didn’t realize this was the case.

      • Uprise42
        link
        fedilink
        1811 months ago

        Apple has very explicitly stated in very clear terms that the health app does not share data with other apps or devices unless you give permission. And as someone who has given that permission (twice, once to give a meal tracker write permission and once to link to my doctors office’s application for read and write) it’s for every application. It’s not a “hey you need to let everyone have access or no one”. You can get fairly granular.

        There’s always the possibility of lying but usually when a company goes that hard on saying the same thing is so many different ways it’s legit. They don’t commit like that unless they know they won’t get in trouble. Those kinds of statements could open them to false advertising claims if it got out they were taking your health data.

        Here’s a link to their privacy document which reviewed a good bit of info: https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/Health_Privacy_White_Paper_May_2023.pdf

        • @Substance_P
          link
          English
          211 months ago

          I’ll stand corrected on my original comment then. I hope that with Google being dragged through the courts at the moment, perhaps it may inspire more interest and conversation about how our data is handled and how it pertains to the implications around privacy.

    • @SulaymanF
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      Health app has encrypted data that doesn’t go to Apple without explicit permission

  • Kokesh
    link
    English
    4911 months ago

    One damn iPhone in my home network makes most calls home out of anything in my home network. I cn see it in AdGuard Home log.

  • Grammaton Cleric
    link
    English
    4811 months ago

    Yeah, but Android doesn’t make me constantly enter my password to do basic things. Also, Apple takes away a lot of control from their consumers.

    I’ll take the phone that isn’t dumbed down tyvm

    • ijeffOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3811 months ago

      Ideally you shouldn’t have to compromise. GrapheneOS without Google is an option.

      • 520
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        It literally isn’t - Graphene only supports Google Pixel phones.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          2011 months ago

          You’ve apparently missed the point. Graphene exists solely to harden security and privacy by disabling the googly parts of the phone. That is clearly what was meant by “without Google”

              • Possibly linux
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 months ago

                Graphene is is way over hyped. You can basically the same thing with lineage os. The key is just not using gsf

                • LaggyKar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  611 months ago

                  But then you can’t use any apps that require Play Services. The killer feature of GrapheneOS is letting you run Play Services in a sandbox.

          • 520
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            And how do you know there aren’t hardware level trackers in Google’s chips? The kind Graphene can’t override? Do you trust Google not to do that?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              311 months ago

              Because this will get .001% more total data considering the low number of GrapheneOS users. Besides, this is highly illegal and would result in significant public outcry and legal consequences far greater in cost than any potential benefits.

              And if you cannot trust Google with their processors, you cannot trust any other company either.

              • 520
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Because all of that has stopped OEMs in the past…oh wait! No it hasn’t (looks at Lenovo)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              311 months ago

              The people who install Graphene and other modified Android variants on their devices are a lot more likely to be monitoring packets sent from their devices.

              Believe me, we’d know the same day an android device that had been de-Googled called home. That would make worldwide news.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              Yeah I trust them not to do it. Cause when it was found out not if when it would hurt them.

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              English
              211 months ago

              Ultimately you can’t know everything. At some point you have to trust someone. The graphene people seem to know they are doing imo. Ultimately everything is flawed, you just have to know when to say "good enough ". The pixel hardware is pretty great imo and they are often cheap, so I think it’s worth considering them given that they can be hardened in various ways.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            I want to like Lineage, but while it doesn’t come with extra bloat, the system itself doesn’t do a whole lot of degoogling core services

        • Jay
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          +1 for Lineage, been using them since they forked from cyanogenmod

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        GrapheneOS still takes away a bit of control though. Mainly in that it’s locked down for privacy in some ways that you can’t disable

        • Alonely0 🦀
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          @soulfirethewolf @ijeff its biggest lockdown is the security model, which even though it won’t disallow you from doing anything you couldn’t otherwise do (if you’re motivated enough), it draws the line of tradeoffs to make. I gave up rooting and a lot of stuff (like contactless payments) for it’s security and stability, and I’m fine with that, but you should ask yourself if that’s worth it for you. If you have to go out of your way to break the security model, even once, then it isn’t for you.

    • @Melco
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • @spaxxor
    link
    English
    3611 months ago

    Pot, meet kettle

  • @Etterra
    link
    English
    3311 months ago

    Oh irony, thy name is Apple.

  • @books
    link
    English
    2411 months ago

    Google, the famous advertising company is using its hardware,software and infrastructure to watch everything we are doing?

    I’m shocked.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      English
      1211 months ago

      Apple, ruthlessly opposing standards any time it can make them a buck no matter how many people have to suffer the consequences.

      I’m shocked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -311 months ago

        Apple got shit on when they went all in on USB on the Mac. People complained they couldn’t use their mice and keyboards anymore.

        They shit on FireWire and thunderbolt and called them proprietary, even those were both industry standard ports. Same for DisplayPort.

        They switched to USB-C exclusively and then people complained that they had to buy dongles.

        In the modern era, they have had maybe 3 or 4 proprietary ports.

        It doesn’t seem so ruthless to me.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          511 months ago

          Which is why iMessage is open source and supported on all platforms, right? ;)

          They should have switched to USB c years ago, they only did it because the EU forced them

          Apple gets far less hate than it deserves. Fucking garbage company

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Did the EU force Apple to switch the iPad to USB-C? For that matter, didn’t Apple have like 20 or so engineers on the USB-C spec?

            I don’t know how much more hate Apple can get, their mere existence enables an entire tech-journalism ecosystem dedicated to laying out their evils and predicting their demise. It’s good for the economy!

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              English
              311 months ago

              Interesting perspective. Apple did not roll it out on their phones for reasons of greed like I said. Their team being involved in the spec only makes it more frustrating that they refused to fucking adopt it universally.

              I don’t know how much more hate Apple can get

              I would say I don’t know how much corporate cock can be sucked by the public. This is the world’s first trillion dollar company for fuck’s sake

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                As I understand it, Apple was frustrated with micro-USB, pushed the development of C and released Lighting for the meantime.

                The fact that after years of USB C on the market, they still needed to be legally forced to use the spec they wanted to happen so badly…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -111 months ago

                Apple didn’t make enough off of Lightning for greed to be a factor. Hell the majority of Lightning cables sold were unlicensed knockoffs from Amazon and the grocery checkout aisle.

                The reason Apple is so rich is that Apple isn’t really dominant in any of the markets they compete at this point(save for the tablet and watch, and that dominance is basically due to the incompetence of Microsoft(surface sucked and Android makers exited the market)) and Google(wearOS evaporated for like 3 years)).

                Apple is rich because aside from a few high profile failures, they sell premium products that are competent in targeted categories, and their competitors sell a wide variety products of varying quality in every market category imaginable. What happens then is if Apple releases a new ithing, you can probably buy it and be good, so one Apple purchase leads to another, and they all sync, so might as well pay for iCloud, etc.

                • @TrickDacy
                  link
                  English
                  111 months ago

                  If I knew you IRL after this conversation I would assume that any statement you made was the precise opposite of what is true.

                  You’re also sounding a bit like a shitty LLM that isn’t really making sense.

  • NessD
    link
    English
    2311 months ago

    “only when it provides a better customer service” Hahaha. That’s so vague that it is completely meaningless.

    • @woelkchen
      link
      English
      711 months ago

      They are not wrong

      The best lies have a bit of truth in them, by making a factual statement and then deliberately coming to a wrong conclusion. They are wrong when the second half of the claim is that Apple is somehow any different. There is tracking and analytics everywhere in Apple systems. They don’t need to formally tie the Apple ID to other tracking methods when they can just use other means to find out that two connections come from the same device.

      At least in the Android world there at least is the option to go fully free of Google Services. There is no iOS Open Source Project that includes everything but a few things.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -511 months ago

        You’re making huge assumptions based on a single slide that doesn’t state it’s own conclusion. To me this easily is showing that Apple limits how data is used compared to Google, it doesn’t try to show that Apple doesn’t track you.

        • @woelkchen
          link
          English
          011 months ago

          You’re making huge assumptions based on a single slide that doesn’t state it’s own conclusion.

          I’m making assumptions based on the fact that it’s a slide from an internal presentation. Since it’s an internal presentation, it’s about displaying Apple in the best possible light to its employees… employees who may think to accept job offers from Google.

            • @woelkchen
              link
              English
              011 months ago

              Again you’re assuming that’s what the target is.

              Yes, I literally wrote “I’m making assumptions based on the fact that…”.

              • phillaholic
                link
                fedilink
                English
                011 months ago

                Which is 100% speculation on your part. Given this was from 2013 and Apple went on to advertise privacy publicly, it stand to reason it’s more about how they could market their product based on the truth of what they don’t do compared to Google than some sort of employee retention or spin.

                • @woelkchen
                  link
                  English
                  011 months ago

                  Which is 100% speculation on your part.

                  No, the slide being part of an internal Apple presentation is not speculation at all and going from that verified fact, it’s absolutely fair to make educated assumptions based on that. Nowhere it I claim that my comment is 100% fact. You don’t seem to get this in your head.

                  it stand to reason it’s more about how they could market their product

                  100% speculation.

    • roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      I don’t think they want to be. I just think they want to fragment Android. I agree with them.

      • krimsonbun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 months ago

        The fall of android would be the fall of the only reliable open os for phones. I’m not seeing many custom roms for privacy based on iOS.

        • roguetrick
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          Opening a space for an OS fork led by a consortium of mobile phone manufacturers that don’t have a vested interest in supporting their ad and tracking business would be an overall benefit. Google sees value in android only for that, and that’s a major problem.

      • /home/pineapplelover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I would like to think that the percentage of users who have grapheneOS is maybe 5% of the pixel population. I’m just pulling a number out of my ass right now but basically a lot of people who want the very best privacy and security go for graphene which is limited to only Pixels even though there are more cool phones like the fp5.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          Lineage is by far the most popular custom ROM and it has about 3.2 million active devices. Which is about nothing in comparison to 1.22 billion smartphones sold alone in 2022. Barely anyone uses third party ROMs.

        • Gunpachi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          There are some people who use other roms like Lineage without the google apps. It’s not as good as Graphene but it’s better than the OEM version that comes with the phones.

  • UltraMagnus0001
    link
    English
    11
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Don’t forget our vehicles are also tracking us. Soon our Ai trainers will have enough data to guide us in their path and we’ll love what they tell us we should do.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      One more advantage of the used cars I buy: the cell network they can connect to doesn’t exist anymore (the radios don’t exist, the company itself exists, but they have upgraded towers to not support older cell connections).