Reuters

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    1091 year ago

    At risk? They are actively experiencing a genocide

    • @fishos
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      I think they mean “at risk of completing full genocide”, sadly enough.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “it’s not technically a genocide, if it’s still in progress”

        The world really hasn’t paid attention to this particular conflict, until now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The genocide deniers: acting like an angry drill instructor saying “zero, zero, zero, no partial credit for incomplete genocides” …

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      UN protocols demands being careful when using certain terms when referring to a given event before a proper resolution or investigation has been carried out. If you follow the news, you will notice that they warn about obviously blatant war crimes as “might be a war crime”. What’s noticeable isn’t that they’re following their own protocols, but that they’re bringing the war crimes to everyone’s attention.

    • Hello_there
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Gotta put the ultra orthodox settlers somewhere. Netanyahu thinks it’s free land

  • ALQ
    link
    English
    881 year ago

    The Israeli mission to the U.N. in Geneva called the comments “deplorable and deeply concerning” and blamed Hamas for civilian deaths.

    (Insert “why would they do this” meme here.)

    Hamas is evil, yes, but that doesn’t prevent the Israeli government from also being evil.

  • @kittenzrulz123
    link
    English
    701 year ago

    It’s clear and all reasonable people agree, Israel must cease their ethnic cleansing.

    • @badbytes
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      You selected very good word in your description. I will steal these.

    • @qnick
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      What ethnicity are you talking about?

        • @qnick
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Palestinian is not an ethnicity, it’s just where you live, like Californian, or New-Yorker.

          The ethnicity would be Arabs.

          • @randon31415
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Then I’m sure other Arab countries would gladly take these people into their countries, since they are the same ethnicity, after all. What? They don’t? They see them as a different ethnicity and don’t want a(nother) provocative minority in their country?

            • @emax_gomax
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, ethnicity isn’t really a qualification for citizenship. And all countries with an ethnic majority aren’t really obligated to take in people of the same ethnicity. The only country I’ve heard of with such a policy is weirdly enough Israel itself. The other arab countries should take Palestinians in just as an act of morality but this “they don’t because of their race” take is bizarre to me. Its very publicly because they don’t want a sizable chunk of their population to have supported radical governments like hamas (even if most Palestinians don’t and haven’t had the chance to since what is it, 2006?).

          • @ghostdoggtv
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Doesn’t change the fact that they’re mass murdering a bunch of innocent people in order to terrorize the indigenous people into compliance

  • @badbytes
    link
    English
    401 year ago

    Risk?!? The Palestinian’s have been murdered for 50+ yrs in a genocidal occupation. Silly UN.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think Reuters very much know it’s genocide. They put the conciliatory language in there to try to mollify people from attacking them. The important thing is a mainstream, reputable, mostly objective news source is socializing the fact that this is a genocide. That’s progress.

    • @Something_Complex
      link
      English
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess hornet set the bar to hight so the Israeli gov will only stop when the finally kill more then 6 000 000 innocent civilians.

      No for real what haunts me is that they are the descendents of those who survived such massacres over the history only to do it themselves when they finally gained power. (They is Israel’gov)

      Edit: Hitler not hornet, wtf sorry guys

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -81 year ago

        All humans are like that. Humans are inherently evil. The only way they do good is if they are forced to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I can say with 110% certainty that I don’t need to be forced to not commit genocide. Hell, I don’t even need to be forced to commit individual murders. If murder was made legal tomorrow, I’m pretty sure that I wouldn’t go on a killing spree because I’m no longer forced to not murder.

          Talk about telling on yourself, if this is what you genuinely think is true for everyone

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I can tell you absolutely that you are just lying to yourself. Under the right circumstances, and with the right propaganda, you too would have a knife to your neighbor’s throat. So would all of us. No one is perfectly insusceptible to lies, manipulation, propaganda, or the right sales pitch geared specifically to your personality, beliefs and psychological profile. All of which is pretty easy for the ruling class to both access and use for their twisted plans.

            You just don’t want to admit it because you know deep down inside, it’s true and that bothers you. Humble yourself.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Maybe you ought to humble yourself, given that you’re the one stating that you know with absolute certainty how another individual that you know nothing about would or wouldn’t act.

              I never said I was immune to propoganda, lies, or manipulation - there are just simply no lies, manipulations, or propoganda that could make me abandon my morals to the extent of literal genocide. You could probably get me to hate a group you wanted me to hate, but I wouldn’t murder my own worst enemy - so that’s not going to get you anywhere.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I do know with certainty how you would or wouldn’t act in a situation like that, because you are a human being and human behavior is both predictable and programmable. Which the ruling class does. All the time. Because it is the truth whether you like it or not.

                You’re welcome to go read a psychology or a marketing book and find out all about it if you want. Go read a history book and go learn how regular, upstanding people just like you and me out in Germany got schnookered into supporting the wholesale attempted genocide of the Jewish people. Go step outside and go to a protest here, in the U.S. today and as they and the counterprotesters come to blows, try to convince yourself you’re anything more than a susceptible, imperfect, fallible human being like the rest of us.

                If you say you know with certainty you’d never support or commit genocide, you are saying you’re immune to propaganda, lies and manipulation. And misinformation while we’re at it.

                You are not a perfect person and you are just as capable of committing atrocities as the people you look down upon are.

                Humble yourself. Grow up while you’re at it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Chill yo. Humans are inherently good. None of us want to have a bad interaction. So we try to win-win cuz that’s the easiest and best outcome for both parties and for me. See?

            • @ghostdoggtv
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              either you’re evil or you need to be humiliated

              You really are just telling on yourself

        • @Something_Complex
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I wonder if that’s the lack of hope talking or the profound knowledge of yourself that motivates you to say that that

  • @Burn_The_Right
    link
    English
    39
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Risk” of genocide? Risk?

    They need to update their fucking AI model.

    The burning house is at risk of catching fire. The dead man is at risk of heart failure. This headline is at risk of being full of shit.

      • Annoyed_🦀
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The man being shot is currently allegedly bleeding to death.

        • bobalot
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          There was a Hamas tunnel under the headline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -191 year ago

      as the global population increases over time, so do deaths. a small conflict like this may not even be statistically significant.

      • BabyWah
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Mark my words, history will remember this. We can practically watch it live with social media and so on. Wars are different now, since Ukraine. So it hits closer home.

  • @febra
    link
    English
    211 year ago

    US: seen

    • @mob
      link
      English
      -11 year ago

      What would you like the US to do in this situation?

      • @febra
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Maybe don’t veto any attempt by the security council to impose a ceasefire.

  • @Mrkawfee
    link
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Netanyahu is committing genocide in Gaza in much the same way that Milosovic did in Bosnia.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    GENEVA, Nov 2 (Reuters) - United Nations experts called on Thursday for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, saying time was running out for Palestinian people there who find themselves at “grave risk of genocide”.

    Nearly four weeks of Israeli bombardment against the Gaza Strip in retaliation for deadly attacks by Hamas gunmen in southern Israel on Oct. 7 have killed more than 9,000 people, made up of a majority of women and children, health authorities in the Hamas-run enclave say.

    “We remain convinced that the Palestinian people are at grave risk of genocide,” the group of experts, made up of seven U.N. special rapporteurs, said in a statement.

    Speaking to Reuters after the experts’ statement was issued, one of its signatories said the people of Gaza had been deprived of the “the most basic elements for living.”

    “We are using the term risk of genocide because the process that is (underway) is absolutely indiscriminate, affecting, in this case, more than 2 million people,” said Pedro Arrojo Agudo, Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation.

    “The situation in Gaza has reached a catastrophic tipping point,” the U.N. experts said, adding that Gazans had been left with scarce water, medicine, fuel and essential supplies while facing health hazards.


    The original article contains 520 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 59%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @TokenBoomerOP
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hold up their speedy. They’re not there yet. It took the Nazis over 5 years to get to that connotation. Let the Israelis cook. /s

      • Calavera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Well, Israel is doing this for many decades now

        • @TokenBoomerOP
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          You got me there. Damn, you may be right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I’d rather call them facists. A core component of nazism is it’s antisemitism and that seems a touch ridiculous to call israel despite how unfriendly zionosts can be to anti/non zionosts jewish folk.

      • @ghostdoggtv
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Aren’t Arabs semitic people? If it’s true it’s true

    • @TokenBoomerOP
      link
      English
      -21 year ago

      Maybe a truce, a cessation of hostilities, armistice or day of tranquility?

  • Limitless_screaming
    link
    fedilink
    -6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What even is the purpose of a ceasefire? I don’t even understand why the occupation government is against it, they could use it to their advantage. Agree to a ceasefire, give some time for people to desperately try to escape Gaza, allow some aid to the people remaining there, and when it’s all over and people stop seeing you as the monsters you are, then you can continue your “war” and less people will care.

    Afraid Hamas might use that time and aid? Well don’t worry, your army is already getting wrecked on the ground, but it doesn’t matter to you; you can continue wasting equipment, men, and oxygen for as long as you like, while Hamas cannot. Your army will take control of the area, and either get rid of everyone there or get kicked out a second time, either way, you have achieved your actual goals.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      From an international perspective, calling for a ceasefire is reducing the window of forgiveness that Israel currently enjoys from the October 7th terrorist attack.

      The more time that passes, the less tolerance global politicians have, for blatant all-out war crimes.

      This isn’t a secret, the Israeli government knows this, the Israeli military knows this, their doctrine documents acknowledge that they have a window of activity from any tragedy, international politicians know this, their allies know this, the Americans know this.

      So every time an ally of theirs, calls for any delay, ceasefire combo humanitarian aid, they’re trying to reduce that window, so there’s less political damage control they have to conduct for their allies behavior.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      escape where though? Egypt isnt going to let them in - Egypt has a lot of economic issues right now, they cant handle a bunch of refugees. maybe they could take a boat to Lebanon, Syria, or Turkey - Syria and Turkey are still struggling with the aftermath of that massive earthquake & are unlikely to be welcoming. Lebanon could accept them but there’s not a lot going on there. where else then? Jordan maybe?

      • Limitless_screaming
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Exactly, not many will even be able to escape if they’re worried about that, but they can still claim that they let people escape.

  • @DoomBot5
    link
    English
    -21
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    More empty calls for ceasefire with not a single plea for Hamas to so much as release the hostages.

    • @ABCDE
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      They have asked already.

      • @DoomBot5
        link
        English
        -101 year ago

        Ah yes, ask once nicely for hostage release, condemn Israel daily for not having a ceasefire.

        • Machinist3359
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          A few hostages vs killing hundreds of children. Wonder why there is a discrepancy, also, what is a moral compas?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      First: I completely agree the hostages should be released unconditionally.

      Second: the calls for a ceasefire are for humanitarian reasons, they are not there to support Hamas. The civilians are dying regardless, That’s what the global outrageous about. Israeli civilians, Palestinian civilians… I don’t want any civilians to die.

    • @filister
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They were active negotiations going before Israel went all out in Gaza, and there were 4 hostages released.

      Didn’t Netanyahu say that hostages are not their top priority? And by bombing all those tunnels while perfectly well know that all the hostages are kept there is kind of a signal that he cares very little for the wellbeing of his own people.

      I think relatives of those held in captivity are already quite discontent and pissed off with your war cabinet, aren’t they?

      • @DoomBot5
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        That’s 4 hostages out of 200. All 4 still have family being held hostage. They were released so you’d be able to say exactly that. Don’t fall into Hamas’s hands so readily.

        • @filister
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          The truth is that Israel didn’t really try to release them. They just started the ground offensive and intensified the airstrikes and started bombing the tunnels the same where those hostages are believed to be.

          So ELI5 how is helping the hostages? As this in my eyes is another proof that this war cabinet cares very little about them. And the relatives of those hostages are expressing their anger openly and dissatisfaction.

          In an interview with the BBC, Goren describes his cousin as “an average guy, he’s a civil engineer, he’s got a wife, he’s got three kids”. His family is “sick with worry”, Udi says.

          But his biggest frustration is that he feels the families of hostages “just can’t trust anyone”.

          “We don’t trust our government, [we don’t trust] that they’re doing their best to bring them back. Obviously we don’t trust Hamas,” he explains, adding that they’re “not getting any clear answers”.

          “I don’t see in any way, in any way, how bombing Gaza to the ground is going to get my cousin back. I don’t see in any kind of scenario, how this is getting him back alive sooner,” Goren adds.

          • @DoomBot5
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            The truth is that Israel didn’t really try to release them.

            They literally did just that not 2 days ago. It’s just an extremely difficult and dangerous job trying to rescue hostages in the massive network of terror tunnels Hamas has built.