• Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    1521 year ago

    Fortunately, this is easily avoided by not using Chrome.

    • RooPappy
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      It would be best to make the switch today. That has the dual benefit of a) Showing Google that they will lose users, and maybe they will change their mind (again), and b) Show every website that they do need to put actual effort into supporting and testing against Firefox.

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      English
      -131 year ago

      It’s been easily avoided for years now despite alarmists saying ad block would stop working as far back as 2020. I don’t even have an ad blocker installed on Vivaldi and the built in blocking has worked just fine, even the other day when people started having issues with YouTube V just kept doing its job.

      I’ll believe it when I see it, and the day it happens I’ll switch to FF. Until then I’m not going to reduce the user experience with this armchair virtue signalling that you all pretend is making a difference.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Chromium isn’t Chrome… And they work to keep the worst of what googie tries to force into the core chromium project from Chrome out of their implementation. One of the benefits of chromium itself being open source.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          That depends heavily on who you ask, around here.

    • Senex
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      For me, the future is Firefox and Linux.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      Yeah but putting all our hopes into Firefox is quite dangerous. All Google needs to do to fuck us over is to stop funding Firefox.

  • Tygr
    link
    English
    761 year ago

    Recently made the switch from Edge to Firefox to fully ditch Chromium. The more I read, the more I realize it was a great decision.

      • Tygr
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I liked it. Found it better than Chrome for my needs to finally get away from Google. I hadn’t realized I went from Chrome to Chromium. Within a year, I am now switched to Firefox. After theming it and stuff, I’m now liking it way more than everything else. It does everything I need and looks beautiful.

        I also enjoy Firefox Focus on iOS which is basically incognito on steroids. Any time I click a link, it defaults to FFF.

      • iFarmGolems
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        It’s better than chrome. Smaller memory footprint and a bit faster. Source: I’m web dev.

  • Piecemakers
    link
    English
    751 year ago

    Stop. Using. Chrome. FFS.

  • @rob299
    link
    English
    401 year ago

    In other words, these older extentions work just fine, no one wants the new limited features, and google is force disabling older extentions despite any outcries from its users because it can.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    361 year ago

    🎶No they won’t because I don’t use chrome 🎶

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    The popular uBlock Origin extension, for example, would be limited under Manifest V3. The developer created uBlock Origin Lite, a reduced version that is compatible with Manifest V3.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Running winget install firefox should fix that problem for windows users

    EDIT: Fuck off autocorrect

  • @satans_crackpipe
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    My what extensions? Isn’t that the keylogger and network compute software with perfunctory ad delivery features?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I made the switch to waterfox (Firefox fork) that strips out much of the problematic mozilla stuff.

    I started to switch because of the tab containers, as I work across a dozen or so accounts in our MSP business.

    Now I realised how good Firefox can be if you get rid of the bloat.

    • @glimse
      link
      English
      211 year ago

      Firefox is great regardless of “the bloat”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I would say it’s good, but could be great with small adjustments in the way it is packaged.

    • ripcord
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I’ve never once used Firefox and thought “man, is there bloat here”. Whatwas bugging you?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I was mainly referring to how sluggish it was. For my web apps, it was always slower and the UI would bog down. Maybe not the correct definition of you refer to unnecessary features.

        I am more referring to how lean or streamline the software is. Both in front end design and backend.

        A lot of browser performance has to do with how you use it, so my experience is not universal.

        Still, even full fat Firefox is skinny compared to the morbidly obese Chrome and edge browsers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          So weird to me how when Chrome first came out, it was the opposite: Firefox was getting sluggish and poorly optimized with too much going on, and Chrome was sleek and fast and seemed to just have what was needed to work.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            These things go in cycles. But I think the writing is on the wall. Google will never make the investment to unbloat Chrome.

      • JohnEdwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There isn’t much, Waterfox removes Pocket and disables most of the telemetry, tweaks some of the settings to be more privacy and performance minded, swaps google from default search engine and iirc it has more aggressive compiler optimization settings in exchange for having slightly more modern hardware requirements. And the default theme is more compact and less chrome-esque.

        It originally was just about providing 64-bit builds of Firefox back when Mozilla didn’t yet, today it’s mostly “Firefox, but slightly better.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Around the time Chrome first hit the scene, Firefox was getting pretty bloated and inefficient… They’ve come a long way since then but they still do a bunch of unnecessary stuff that should probably be off by default but isn’t

    • Lantern
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Is the correct word to use here grammatically.

      • @killeronthecorner
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        I think they were joking about the fact that they don’t have chrome, thus no extensions

      • Senex
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        You’re missing a word and a question mark in your sentence.

    • Senex
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Yes, “your”. Your is the possessive form of the pronoun you and indicates ownership.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -231 year ago

    firefox did the same thing a while back. all plugins stopped working, some where updated and some lost forever. dont trust moz.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      What, you own some Alphabet stock or something? This is absolutely false and borders on intentional disinformation.

      Firefox has had minor bloat/compatibility issues over the years, like old versions of all browsers… But nothing on this scale!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        I mean, they absolutely did change their extension system, removing a lot of what the extensions had access to. Not to this level, no, but they did do that and a lot of what could be done with Firefox is no longer possible, so I’m not sure how that’s disinformation.

        An unfounded leap from that point to “don’t trust moz”, yes, but the extension change did happen.

        • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          too late…you had a different opinion in the echo chamber. anyways, ofcourse moz fucked this up. just like they did when killing weave and lying to the users that users could still host everything on their own servers. never worked. utter bs. so let’s keep Google search as the default search engine to get some money.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I have no idea what you’re insinuating about me, and frankly I don’t care.

            Have a good one.