Code and comments
I wish I could grep my car keys sometimes.
Back in the 80s/90s there were keyrings that would play an alarm if they heard a whistle at a particular frequency. You’re basically playing Marco Polo with your keys.
I assume they lost popularity because the batteries tended to run out at inopportune times. Batteries are better now. Maybe it’s time those things made a comeback.
I remember those! I think the comeback version is the Tile or AirTag but I’m too old to hear them beep.
My 5 cents:
-
When piping output of
findtoxargs, always use-print0option offindand-0option ofxargs. This allows processing files with any allowed characters in names (spaces, new lines etc.). (However I prefer-exec.) -
There’s an
icommand to insert a line insed, it is better to use it instead ofs/^/...\n/. It makes code more readable (if we can talk about readability ofsedcode, huh). -
If you want to split a delimiter separated line and print some field, you need
cut. Keepawkfor more complicated tasks.
- If you want to split a delimiter separated line and print some field, you need cut. Keep awk for more complicated tasks.
Depends on the delimiter too! For anyone else reading this, sed accepts many kinds of delimiters.
sed "s@thing@thing2@g" file.txtis valid. I use this sometimes when parsing/replacing text with lots of slashes (like directory lists) so I can avoid escaping a ton of stuff.I know, but it is not the case I was talking about. I meant widely used commands like
awk '{print $2}'that can be replaced withcut -f2.I know you know, as you already demonstrated your higher understanding. I just wanted to add a little bonus trick for anyone reading that doesn’t know, and is learning from your examples.
the two are valid and no one is more correct than the other sooo…
agree with one and two and younger me would have agreed with your third point but I think I don’t anymore.
yes cut is the simpler and mostly functional tool you need for those tasks.
but it is just so common to need a slight tweak or to want to substitute something or to want to do a specific regex match or weird multi character delimiter or something and you can do it all easily in awk instead of having to pipe three extra times to do everything with the simplest tool.
-
I’ve only ever found a use for sed once two decades into my career, and that was to work around a bug due to misuse of BigInt for some hash calculations in a Java component; awk remains unused. Bash builtins cover almost everything for which I find those are typically used.
find and grep see heavy daily use.
That’s wild to me, as I used sed all the time. Quickly and easy changes in configs? Bam sed. Don’t even need to open vi when I can grep for what I need, then swap it with sed. Though I imagine more seasoned vi nerds would be able to do this faster.
If you’re using
findall the time, check to see if you have or can have some variant oflocateinstalled. It indexes everything* on the system (* this is configurable) and can be queried with partial pathnames, even with regex, and it’s fast.I use locate when I don’t know where the files are. Find has finer controls and can differentiate between regular files, links, directories, etc.
sedis not for daily use, it is for reusable scripts. For other purposes interactive editors are more convinient.
What software did you use to put the slide deck together? It seems to work so nicely when placed on a webpage, too…
I don’t know what OP used, but it could be any one of the Markdown presentation tools.
I like reveal.js
Your presentation can go in git, looks good anywhere, and easily shared. It’s just html rendered.
I always found “find” very confusing. Currently, I’m using “fd”, which I think has a more sensible UX
Way too many ads on that link for me to read the actual content.
I’ve gotten tired of weird regex stuff in awk, sed, and grep, so I’ve moved to perl -E for all but the most basic of things.
In most cases extended POSIX regexes are enough and looks the same as perl regexes.
I also used perl until I needed to write highly portable scripts that can be run on systems without perl interpreter (e.g. some minimal linux containers). Simple things are also simple to do with grep/sed/awk, more complex things can be done with awk but require a longer code in comparison with perl.
I’ve dealt with systems that lack sed and awk. Bash builtins and other standard tools like cut and tr take care of … well, everything.
Systems with bash but without standard POSIX utils? I know some without bash (freebsd by default, busybox based distros etc.) and with grep, sed and awk, but not vice versa.
deleted by creator
