You’d think this would give us some wiggle money to play with to build out new energy infrastructure. You’re wrong though, there is no wiggle. We need all renewables like Germany.

Although the transition to EVs will require an enormous increase in base production capacity, it would be wasteful to build out nuclear to meet it.

$16m an hour might seem like a lot of damage, but nuclear can only exacerbate economic loss which is equally important as climatic loss.

Renewables now!

    • @NewNewAccount
      link
      910 months ago

      Aren’t they ahead of many other developed nations? Just because they’re not perfect or their journey isn’t complete doesn’t mean their progress isn’t worth taking inspiration from.

      • @deranger
        link
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Germany has made great sacrifice to be a leader in renewables. An example for other nations of what can be accomplished with confident determination.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2110 months ago

    That economic loss isn’t affecting the people it needs to affect for there to be real change. That’s the problem.

  • ZephyrXero
    link
    English
    1310 months ago

    EVs are just a drop in the bucket. Most of the greenhouse gasses come from factories and industrial use

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      transportation accounts for 1/3 of emissions. as that demand transfers from oil to the electric grid, we’ll need a lot more renewable-only capacity

      • @themusicman
        link
        610 months ago

        Transitioning away from cars entirely is far cheaper and more viable than transitioning to EVs. Fuck cars

        • @ChemicalPilgrim
          link
          710 months ago

          We have all this car infrastructure already. Unless the plan is to somehow replace that all with light rail in the next ten years, EVs are a reasonable solution we can roll out on a shorter timeline.

  • @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    710 months ago

    That’s ok, they’ll just raise prices and “rightsize” to keep the shareholders happy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      And in 6 years, we will end coal as the first nation of the industrialized countries. The US is currently planing to phase it out in 16 years. Some other countries do not even have a plan for the next 20 years. What is your point?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -210 months ago

        There are more fossil fuels then just coal though. You could squint and if you were paid to be dishonest you could say that Lignite isn’t coal and therefore in 6 years when Germany is still burning Lignite, they have transitioned away from coal. Additionally they are not planning on transitioning away from Natural Gas at all.