• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    It’s “good” for Dallas because that trade would be god awful if he left for nothing. The fit and the loss of depth are still aspects left uncertain.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It is leaning that way, but I’m willing to give some benefit of the doubt to the small sample size.

        This contract and trade could definitely go down as one that really hurts Luka and the Mavs if it does not improve into this season and beyond.

    • @Samw1ch
      link
      41 year ago

      Yeah I know luka and porzingis didn’t fit well together but I just have a hard time believing kyrie is going to be better. I think the team is still pretty far from being a legit championship contender.

    • @Calvin
      link
      31 year ago

      100%. Mavs would’ve been the laughingstock of the league for letting another guy go for nothing with Brunson

    • @Oxrap
      link
      31 year ago

      Agred. I don’t see how the fit between Luka and Kyrie and then there’s the depth of this squad.

  • @Calvin
    link
    51 year ago

    Honestly much better deal than I expected.

    • @Samw1ch
      link
      21 year ago

      Is this a max deal? I suppose anything less than that is probably good for the mavs even though it seems like there wasn’t much competition in keeping in.

      • @Calvin
        link
        41 year ago

        Not a max, could’ve been 4 years. Plus with third year being a player option, gives some flexibility.

        • @Samw1ch
          link
          41 year ago

          Thanks! I just hope they can get a decent team around Luka. He is a ton of fun to watch but needs a good big.

  • @LostMyRedditLogin
    link
    41 year ago

    Kyrie really wanted more, but that’s not bad for both parties. I hope Ky can just play ball and help Luka, but I doubt it.