• @c2h6
    link
    181 year ago

    Gotta love the narrative here. “what’s the bare minimum we can do to keep the peasants from revolting?”

    • @assassinatedbyCIA
      link
      51 year ago

      Watch as they don’t do it then get surprised that the peasants are revolting.

      • Dick Justice
        link
        41 year ago

        The “clients” they kept calling us, in the article. 🤮

  • @redpen
    link
    71 year ago

    Clare Woodcraft, a fellow at the Centre for Strategic Philanthropy at the University of Cambridge, said wealthy people’s philanthropic efforts had a “bad reputation” because the industry was “poorly understood, poorly executed and poorly regulated”.

    “There is often, unfortunately, too much focus on the passion behind philanthropy and the feelgood factor and not the actual need,” said Woodcraft, who works as an adviser to the super-rich. “Philanthropists are all too keen to jump in when they surmise that there might be a need, without actually having the data.” Clare Woodcraft, second from the right, is a fellow at the Centre for Strategic Philanthropy at the University of Cambridge. Clare Woodcraft, second from the right, is a fellow at the Centre for Strategic Philanthropy at the University of Cambridge. Photograph: Aidan Synnott

    She said many rich people wanted to set up their own educational or health foundations without checking whether there was a need or an existing charity or government-funded programme working to address the issue.

    “I still see way too often family offices that come to me and say: ‘We want to do education, we want to set up a foundation and we want to do it in market X’,” she said.

    Woodcraft said in these cases she would ask the family for their rationale, only for them to reply: “It doesn’t matter. Let’s just get some quick wins, let’s get the money out there.

    “That is the challenge. We need to step back, and have a clear methodology for investing philanthropic capital, because that’s how you’re going to maximise impact and hence mitigate some of the risks of reputational damage.”

    Clare Woodcraft seems to think that philanthropy is the solution to inequality, but individuals helping in ways that they want is just giving them more power to decide the fates of the vast majority of people. Systemic change is needed to take power away from the bourgeoisie and give it to the masses to decide their own economic futures.

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      21 year ago

      They’ve had warnings. There was one in 1917, 1927, 1945, 1953…

  • @theyseemeroland
    link
    51 year ago

    It’s time to fuck up all their shit, just like they’ve been fucking up the world’s shit for over a century.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    We should should make them tackle inequality and then bring out the pitchforks. “You paid the bill but not the interest, bitch!”

  • Naja Kaouthia
    link
    31 year ago

    Did that feel condescending to anyone else or am I just cranky?

  • @redpen
    link
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

      • @return2ozmaOP
        link
        11 year ago

        I didn’t delete anything, I don’t think. First day here trying to figure it out. What was the comment?

        • @redpen
          link
          21 year ago

          Oh okay, I must have fat-thumbed it somehow. I was trying to edit it for a spelling error. I’ll remake it!

          • @SuperSoftAbby
            link
            21 year ago

            I’ve done that a few times. though you can undelete it by clicking on the red trash can again. very nifty!