This needs a follow up study how many of The children looking at non-social objects have an autistic parent but “neurodivergent traits can be part of the genetic inheritance” isn’t as catchy as a title.
deleted by creator
When I saw the title my first thought was “Isn’t that just an autism test”
I think that’s a more catchy title.
Ok maybe, but it doesn’t really say much, its already well established that autism/adhd/etc can be passed down.
I believe most labels are just groupname for a specific set of neurodivergent features. And those features are the result of minor ways peoples brain differ from dominant norm. If all dna followed the dominant norm we would be identical and evolution would come to a halt.
Many neurodivergent people are capable of leading healthy lives and getting children. There are often advantages that cancel out the negatives. So those differently evolved features are not disappearing and instead getting passed on through generations almost becoming some form of neurological race.
The study would be way more remarkable if they could proof that some enfants avoid faces with no possible influenced by their genes.
Oh boy, this is kind of scary. Not that we have differences. But if you for some reason are in contact with social services, I’ve seen on a TV documentary, that they use this as a significant parameter to judge whether the infant is properly cared for.
I bet practices differ, but it seemed like if the infant didn’t seek eye contact, that was something that was universally accepted as a very negative sign.
The documentary I saw, there was actually a couple that had their infant child taken away, partially based on this issue! I’m not saying they made a mistake, but there definitely is a potential for it.Very well but - - do we know how our genetics impacts how much we, as a specie, are more or less aggressive or tame - - in the sense of what happened in this fox’s study :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_silver_fox
