I can’t find anyone talking about it (or maybe searching here isn’t my forte yet).

What do you think about it?

  • @Ahmed
    link
    English
    121 year ago

    I prefer the old one, 2000s WEB nostalgia.

  • John
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    I’ve made a post just yesterday with some suggestions xD But I guess they were already working on a new one, and the generic globe was just a placeholder.

    The new one seems to follow the same style as their Mastodon.world logo.

    I think it’s better than the placeholder, but a bit hard to read maybe.

    And I particularly would prefer if the Lemmy instances tried to follow a similar design rules (in the logo and overall site design, and if possible in their names/domains lol), so it have a consistent branding and look more visually appealing to possible new users.

  • Drew Got No ClueOP
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    I feel like the logo has potential, but right now it looks very “graphic design is my passion”. 💀

  • @TeaHands
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    We had a thread with some suggestions in yesterday but maybe Ruud decided all our suggestions were terrible and took matters into his own hands :D

  • Odin
    link
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think the old one was a placeholder. The new one looks like the mastodon.world icons

  • @TVPaulD
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    The lettering doesn’t scale very well. I assume it worked better for Mastodon World being “MW.” With this being “LW” the same stylisation looks fairly awkward, especially when scaled down.

  • Ɀeus
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i hate it… : (

    the old one looked really good; it had character and skeuomorphism and stood out in the instance list

    the new one looks… fine, i guess. it’s there. i can’t really say anything about it, apart from it’s a bit dark and too busy, but it has nothing going for it

    • Drew Got No ClueOP
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I think the colors are a main problem, especially the lack of contrast dark blue + black.

      Maybe some of it could be overlayed on a simplified globe?

      • Ɀeus
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        to be honest, it’s the simplification that i dislike. it’s so fucking corporate and soulless, it looks like somebody outsourced it to the cheapest bidder

        i also think it is starting to look dated, as even corporations are moving back to designs with depth (look at the new edge logo and fluent design in general, or gnome circle apps)

        • Drew Got No ClueOP
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          A few look kind of nice, but for others I need c/eyebleach now.

          Also, fuck Google and their impossible-to-tell-apart logos! Like, if you have a dozen of Google apps, you need to stop and think because there’s nothing obvious now to identify them.

  • @denton
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    Prefer it to the old one

  • @tallwookie
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    oh yeah, didnt it used to be a globe?

  • SanguinePar
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    I like it, although it’s a bit unclear when it’s very small, eg as a favicon.

  • Gort
    link
    English
    01 year ago

    Sort of comes out as a smudge in a dark square when it’s a favicon. Still, an improvement over the previous one.