• @a4ng3l
    link
    English
    1311 months ago

    As much as I’m not letting my steak or chicken to vegans I really don’t understand why the fur business is kept alive. Who the fuck has the shit taste to wear that? And can afford it? Eating a cow I can get but skinning ferrets no fucking way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1311 months ago

      Eating animals is nothing someone that likes animals would do. “They are treated like cattle”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Who the fuck has the shit taste to wear that?

      Chinese people. Fur is largely exported. In any case: “glass house and throwing stones”. Your steaks are a taste thing as well. In both cases you have animals killed for something you like, not something you need. Especially since the cow is likely skinned for leather as well.

    • @FireTower
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      Not the fur farm side of the industry but actual trapping is still done but as a means of controlled population management for furbears. Specific species like beaver have a tendency to continually grow their populations as many places we’ve extirpated all natural predators.

      • Devi
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        If the ecosystem is fucked then we need to restore the ecosystem, not start killing things to attempt a poor replication.

        • @FireTower
          link
          English
          311 months ago

          The point is that it allows us to gain metrics on the population so we can implement meaningful changes, based on data.

          • Devi
            link
            fedilink
            011 months ago

            That makes zero sense, if you’re collecting data then you don’t take action as that spoils the experiment. If you’ve collected the data then you know the results and should start fixing things.

            At no point during this situation is there a decade or so for populations to ‘explode’.

              • Devi
                link
                fedilink
                011 months ago

                Why are you saying ‘removed’ when you mean killed?

                • @FireTower
                  link
                  English
                  011 months ago

                  Dead furbearers are no longer a part of the population due to the means of sampling, trapping. So they’ve been removed from the population.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 months ago

    Dying industries have long deathrattles. Sometimes it’s more merciful and environmental to kill then before “the economy” is ready.

  • Franzia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 months ago

    This is horrifying, I didnt realize these animals are actually farmed and not trapped / hunted.

    • Materials and fabrics have some such a long way there is no need for fur in terms of density of warm material (winter coats) or for softness.
    • There are other uses for fur like makeup and shaving brushes, where fur is the best but for almost all users, plastic brushes will do a perfect job.

    I would be really excited to see a day where even leather is replaced by a superior alternative, and I’m very curious about waxed canvas, and any other waterproofing that doesnt involve PTFE chemicals.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The EU executive has decided to buy time pushing back to 2026 a decision on whether to introduce an EU-wide ban on the keeping and killing of animals for fur.

    The announcement came on Thursday (7 December) in response to a European Citizens Initiative (ECI) which gathered 1.5 million signatures calling to prohibit livestock farming for the sole or main purpose of fur production, as well as selling farmed animal fur and products containing it within the EU.

    Citizen initiatives allow petitions that reach the one million signatures threshold to be discussed by the European Commission, which can decide to put forward a legislative proposal on the matter.

    According to a senior EU official, the Commission will in the meantime “not just talk on the phone with member states” but take some practical steps, which will include on-site visits to fur farms.

    “It is deeply frustrating and worrying that the Commission is side-stepping its responsibility for decisive action to end the outdated and unnecessary fur trade,” said Joanna Swabe, senior director at Human Society International/Europe adding that leading virologists warn that fur farms present a very real pandemic disease risk.

    However, for the animal welfare campaign group Four Paws, the Commission has now made it clear that it is open to an EU-wide ban on fur farming, and it is “confident that an independent scientific opinion from [EU food safety body] EFSA will conclude that the current housing systems in fur farms are incompatible with animal welfare.”


    The original article contains 458 words, the summary contains 247 words. Saved 46%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -211 months ago

    What’s the alternative? Plastic fake fur? Why we don’t stop the cruel farming of all animals? The whole discussion is very much hypocritical.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      Alternative is no fur, we have plenty of materials to keep us warm. Fur farming is particularly cruel. I usually discourage people from looking it up but you might need it.