• @dlpkl
    link
    661 year ago

    Make. Police. Financially. Liable.

      • @reddig33
        link
        45
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If they had to carry “malpractice” insurance (even if through their union) it would become self-correcting. Any payouts would come from that, and not tax money. Can’t get insured? Can’t get hired. Driving up union dues? Can’t get hired.

        • @EatYouWell
          link
          11 year ago

          That’s kinda how it works now, except the city’s are usually the one with the policy.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            61 year ago

            That’s kinda how it works now,

            If officers or the union were paying the insurance premiums then taxpayers wouldn’t be paying $700m as the headline claims. So its not how its working now if the city is paying.

            except the city’s are usually the one with the policy.

            And that’s TWO problems. The city shouldn’t be paying the insurance, and each officer should have their own policy. One bad officer’s claims should not affect the premiums paid by good officers.

            • @EatYouWell
              link
              11 year ago

              I don’t disagree with you at all. I’m just pointing out that the settlement money doesn’t come directly from the city’s budget.

              • partial_accumen
                link
                21 year ago

                settlement money doesn’t come directly from the city’s budget.

                You’re suggesting only the insurance company pays all of this?

                Insurance companies don’t operate at losses by design. If Chicago isn’t paying more than this in premiums already, they will soon. Its still the city/taxpayers that pay eventually instead of the officers or union.

    • @EatYouWell
      link
      101 year ago

      No, make the unions. Then they won’t protect corrupt cops.

  • @notannpc
    link
    231 year ago

    Considering they paid out, I feel like the headline should say “people who were framed by cops”. The time for ambiguity was before the judge awarded these victims their money.

    • @massacre
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’ve really hit the most salient point here. The payouts and making cops financially liable is all good discourse, but they really buried the lede. If Chicago has payed out almost 3/4 of a Billion in 23 years to people cops have framed, think of just how systemic this corruption is. I mean, I imagine some payouts might be pretty big, but you’re talking hundreds, probably thousands of incidents! That makes it pretty much part of the job if it’s happening that frequently.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Surprisingly Jon Burge is only a small chunk of that.

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Its money that was awarded in court rulings, its disingenuous to call it ‘people who say they were framed’. Its people that were in fact framed.

  • Froyn
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    If cities were corporations and citizens were shareholders, we’d have sweeping reform overnight.

  • Froyn
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    If cities were corporations and citizens were shareholders, we’d have sweeping reform overnight.