• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1191 year ago

    “It only took us three years, but we’ve finally achieved the full game we should have delivered on day 1.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      671 year ago

      At least they didn’t abandon it. The game was great on PC(v1.4, v1.6) apart from some minor bugs(NOT game breaking bugs).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        551 year ago

        It doesn’t change the fact that they over promised and under delivered and still raked in pre orders.

        Until consumers figure out how to be patient, this is a trend in gaming that is going to continue. To NOT criticize it at every opportunity is doing yourself and every other gaming enthusiast a huge disservice.

        • @filister
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s why I always buy after release and usually wait for some discounts. But I plan to buy BG3 even if it’s not discounted at the winter sale but I think it is pretty obvious that this game is pretty good already.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          As long as some youtuber with a broom-handle-up-his-ass expression in the thumbnail keeps promoting day 1 games to increase FOMO, people will continue to preorder AAA games that they mass produce.

      • Bleeping Lobster
        link
        English
        181 year ago

        It was a good game, just it fell well short of expectations. When you compare the little systems that contribute to games by R* like rdr2 / gta5 feeling so detailed and alive, it felt a bit barren, despite all the gorgeous backdrop and cool abilities.

        “mile wide, inch deep” would be how I described it. The story was excellent but the gameplay loop imo needed some work.

        Have you played the new version / dlc yet (I’ve not so pls no spoilery spoilers)?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          In fairness, I hated rdr2 and don’t really like the gta games because they’re a bit too much “violent life simulator” vs “game” for me.

          As such, the only thing I hated about CP2077 was the bugs, crashes, and balance issues. Admittedly, I loved how cheap I got it because I bought it during the early reputation crash. It was unplayable for a few weeks, but for $17? Damn.

          • Bleeping Lobster
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Yeah for $17 it’d be an absolute steal, assuming it’s playable. Iirc it didn’t crash once for me, just there were sooooo many ridiculous graphical bugs, and so many systems just felt half-arsed or unfinished. Some notable examples for me:

            • looking out over the city from a high point, zooming in on the traffic and finding out they’re sprites

            • no real police / law system, you could have your back to a wall and they’d somehow teleport behind you

            • on my first cyberpsycho case, as the “Thanks for work, I’ll take it from here” call didn’t trigger until leaving the area, I was unsure of what to do with the knocked-out psycho, so I carried them to the trunk of my car. Well, the game did not account for my idiocy and there were, let’s just say, interesting spaghettification results when I drove away

            • the autodrive when calling your car often had hilarious or strange results

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Those are features XD. You are in the future world so teleporting is possible. Maybe some traffic is just holograms? /jk

              • Bleeping Lobster
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                According to the holographic principle, our entire 3d universe is a projection of a 4d space, so really the traffic is more realistic than other games!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I could not complete CP2077 when I first put it in my PS4, but I bought it expecting that. I had a little knockaround fun in the early game and then put it aside until a big patch or two. It did, however, crash at least 1-2x per hour on me the entire first playthrough. By the time I played through a second time, it was down to 1 crash in 5 hours.

              And yeah, I noticed some of the other bullet-points as well :)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You’re telling me CP2077 is not violent? Have you seen how gory it can get? Have we played different games? Because this game is brutal from my experience.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              No, really I’m not. I’m saying “violent life simulator” as a holistic explanation of what rdr2 and gta is. One thing I always loved about some other games like CP2077 and the tES games is that they’re much more forgiving in many ways, instead avoiding mapping on just “realism”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Personally I really enjoy it. Phantom liberty (and the patch to the normal game) adds a new area that is basically a microcity in itself, with a really fun side story that even adds additional endings to the main game.

          No story spoilers ahead:

          The update also brings a lot of randomized content that helps making the city feel much more lively, for example you will encounter random gang shootouts or car chases, or if you pick on one gang enough they will hunt you down as well. The police is a lot more dangerous, and continued resistance will eventually earn you a visit from maxtac. They also got the city transit system working, you can ride by train from a to b if you want while enjoying the view.

          Also, assuming you didn’t play at all since the 2.0 overhaul, they completely reworked the talent trees and skill paths, making them much more distinct and all around fun to play with. The loot and difficulty system is also overhauled, and will mostly scale to your level regardless of where you are in the story, giving much more freedom in what you want to do and when.

          Then there is vehicle combat of course, with a wide range of armed vehicles to obtain, which is also pretty fun and useful.

          Generally it feels much closer to what was promised. It might not be perfect, but it is in a fantastic state in my opinion, the only thing I really miss at this point is the holy grail of third person camera (with a working player model).

          • Bleeping Lobster
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Thanks for the informative reply! I am definitely going to update at some point. I tend to only play one game at a time, not sure if it’s an autism thing but I get very much into one game, play it to completion, do all the side quests if I really like it, then move onto the next… don’t replay games very often.

            I got the absolute worst ending possible on my CP2077 runthrough, I have a save from just before the point-of-no-return and was mopping up all the side activities with the intent of trying to get a better ending. Perhaps I should start a new game from scratch to really appreciate all the additions. Though, I wager I’ll be installing the car handling / HUD element and minimap resizing mods immediately, unless they’ve fixed those issues?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I would definitely recommend doing a fresh save, it gives more opportunity to experience and play with all the new stuff than just rushing dogtown (the new district) with a max level save.

              • Bleeping Lobster
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                Fwiw I wasn’t wondering, I have an official diagnosis. It was pretty funny (at least I thought so)

                Psychiatrist: “Ok, you’ve scored really highly on the test I’ve given you”

                Me: “Oh, awesome!”

                Psychiatrist: “No, not awesome, it means you’re autistic”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I am planning on playing the DLC and probably replay the full story. Yeah apart from main and side missions the world is dead. Haven’t used mods but I doubt the open world will get any better or more enjoyable.

        • @TheDarkKnight
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          It was a solid 7/10 at launch and a clear 10/10 in the state it is in today. The new additions are fantastic and complete the experience imo.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I love CP2077, but there’s no way it was a 7/10 when it crashed every 30 minutes for most people and a significant percent of the quests broke. People (rightly) give flak to Bethesda on how buggy they released games in the past, but CP2077 was arguably buggier than that on release.

            • @TheDarkKnight
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              I mean if you were on PS4 or last gen hardware sure but largely it was stable for the specs current specs at least on PC. Had it day one and maybe a crash every other session…which is fairly normal for a resource intense game at release.

    • @slaacaa
      link
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fans must feel honored for the chance to beta test the game for a year after paying 60 for it.

      • @makyo
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        No it’s not. I mean I like the game that it is and even had fun at launch but I will always be a little salty that it will never be what they said it would be.

      • @NOT_RICK
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        No, but I find it’s fun. Looks great and I love the genre

        • FartsWithAnAccent
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          I did a complete playthrough on release and still had fun. The game is still buggy, but it’s definitely better than it was and I’ve had a good time on my second playthrough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Good thing I haven’t played more than a few hours yet. Imma give this another shot over the holidays I think.

    • @rambaroo
      link
      English
      -61 year ago

      Should they have all worked more crunch time instead?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        No. They should not have released an unfinished game. You know, the game they advertised and sold to people before release.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Exactly. If they released it this year, it could’ve contended for game of the year. Instead, it released in a buggy, unfinished state.

          Release games when they’re done, not when some exec or marketing person says it should release.

      • @BongRipsMcGee420
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        If my years in a technical field have taught me anything, it’s that this half-cooked shit sandwich was made by people in sales and management who were all promoted for making the shareholders happy. It’s always up to the engineers to slap some shit together that they just learned about yesterday and was needed last week.

      • @GeneralEmergency
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        8 years of development and that’s the state of the game at launch.

  • @quams69
    link
    English
    561 year ago

    3 years after release, here’s a finished product

    Lmao the absolute state of the gaming industry

  • @Tikiporch
    link
    English
    461 year ago

    They should have called it the 2080 edition.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you like shooters and cyberpunk stories: Yes.

      The shooting is great, the world is cool as fuck to explore, and the story is on point for the genre.

      If you don’t like shooters or cyberpunk/sci-fi as a genre it probably won’t change your mind. The gameplay isn’t mind-blowing; it’s pretty average though the combat somewhat reminds me of Dishonored except without teleportation and time manipulation other than bullet time. The story is mostly well-written, but there’s one jarring plot hole about half-way through the main story, and the pacing is a little weird when it comes to interacting with Johnny because of the open-world nature; the dialogue, though, is good throughout.

      As an RPG it’s very light. You have choices, and they matter and some of those choices you make by leaving dialogue and just doing something (like shooting a machine or just leaving the area). But you don’t get these all the time, and when you do you have like 3 or 4 options. The skill tree is big, but it’s also a mess (even now after it’s been reworked twice.) I always find myself overwhelmed by how many options there are, but underwhelmed by what they actually give.

      • @makyo
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        What’s the plot hole again? It’s been a while since I played.

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      I went in completely blind, knowing just the name and it’s a future shooter. It’s cool, I did side quests as they became available (ignoring storyline) and I think that’s the best way to do it, vs story first then side.

      I’m disabled so played with a mouse only (kb for menus etc). I had a good time start to finish, and I only fucked up one side-quests (kinda mission design, kinda being an idiot). I haven’t played in a couple years, want to see what the new content is, just been hooked on other games.

      I know the game “fell short” of hype but idc because I was interested and very very intentionally ignored all the hype bullshit. I feel I got my money’s worth, and enjoyed everything so far (story complete, all side as of 2y ago).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Yeah, it’s really fun. If it worked for you on release, it was fun then too, with some issues. Now? Absolutely a blast.

    • Devil
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      I thought the game was dull, characters was dull, voice acting was dull, not interesting story, Keanu was annoying. 4/10. Tried playing again after the new patch,and remembered the game was boring after 5 min.

      • @TheDeepState
        link
        English
        331 year ago

        It was a serious question. I haven’t played this game.

        • BruceTwarzen
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          To me it looks good and has a few fun quests or sidequests. But overall i found it pretty boring. The driving is garbage, enemies are bullet sponges and once you get some upgrades there isn’t even a point in fighting them anymore.

          • Bleeping Lobster
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            The driving was absolutely atrocious imo. Last time I played it, I had to use a lot of mods to make the game not be exasperating.

            Eg… Tiny minimap; poor car handling; the HUD elements not scaling properly and being too small to read

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I liked the gameplay and environmental of Watch_Dogs 2 more (edit: on the latter, it’s about how lively WD2 felt compared to 2077), but Cyberpunk 2077 is still solid. As someone else said, there’s replay value to the different routes you can take. I’d definitely wait for the base game to go on sale though. I got mine for £25 and I think that’s an alright price for it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -311 year ago

          While I find that hard to believe, I’ll take you at your word. As someone who has over 2k hours over the last three years, yes, it’s fun.

          • @TheDeepState
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            That’s cool. I was playing Starfield and kind of lost interest. Aren’t Starfield and Cyberpunk made by the same people?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              Not at all. Starfield is bland horseshit, this game had an extremely compelling setting even when it sucked. At this point it is a great experience with a lot of replay value due to the numerous choices and decisions you can make.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -331 year ago

              What? Are you unable to do even the bare minimum of reading? Are you seriously asking if CDPR and Bethesda are the same developers?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -191 year ago

                  Yup, someone who is able to read, and is able to do the bare modicum of research instead of asking the most generic questions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Yeah and you almost lost your entire company trying to please shareholders that don’t even know what industry you’re in.

    Next time, finish your game, then release it. I promise you, if you put out a game on the same level of polish as BG3, your stock will go up.

    • @filister
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Xbone, I like that!

    • kryllic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      That’s arguably one of the few things that was fine at launch

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Fine, sure, but IIRC they promised branching storyline with meaningful choices, but every review I’ve seen about the story claims it’s very linear and the choices that do exist aren’t particularly meaningful, at least in the context of branching storylines.

        • kryllic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          That’s fair, all choices merge back into three our four endings iirc, so yeah the meaningful choices part does fall flat on its face.

    • Devil
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      It was so painful to play through. So medium and bland

  • @gmtom
    link
    English
    -31 year ago

    Okay but they didnt really add anything meaningful in that time other than the paid DLC, which was still pretty meh. The world is still weirdly barren and outside the unimpactful sidequests their’s very little to do and no realy incentive to do anything.

    • @Raab
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      That’s just not a true statement. The 2.0 update, DLC, and 2.1 updates added an immense amount of stuff.

      • @gmtom
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I already mentioned the DLC but what noteworthy stuff did the other updates add?

        • @Raab
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I’m not going to list them off, I recommend just going to look at the patch notes.

          • @gmtom
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            I have. That’s why I’m making these comments.

            • @Raab
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Why would you even ask what other noteworthy updates were added then? The AI and combat rework alone sells it for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        1.6 and 1.7 were huge steps too, 1.7 with the five most popular mods resembled the current product pretty closely but there were drones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Sure. They didn’t completely rework multiple core systems, improve performance, or anything for people who didn’t buy the dlc. Same exact thing it was when it released. /s

      • @gmtom
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        What core systems did they rework? the only one I can think of is they changed how police spawn.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Police spawning. The entire akill tree. Wardrobe, divorcing the armor stats from appearance. It’s a pretty drastically different game without the DLC from the product it was at launch.

          • @gmtom
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            I mean I litterally mentioned police spawning as the only major mechanic. And none of the other things you mention actually effect gameplay.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I was echoing the police spawning as a point of emphasis. Go look at the old and new skill tree before you say that. That’s as close to gameplay-effecting as you can get. And the wardrobe, yeah, it’s not directly gameplay but it’s definitely more in line with the lore of the world. Oh yeah, vehicle combat was added.

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -71 year ago

    Games are not complete products on launch anymore. It’s all in Beta and the customers are the testers.