• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1711 months ago

    Meanwhile BG3 has gotten massively quest patched, added user requested features, a few new companion endings, etc, all within 2023. And that game was in better shape at launch than SF was.

  • BigFig
    link
    English
    811 months ago

    Too late guys, I already visited every planet, did all major quest lines. Why would I go back?

    • @Bonesince1997
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This isn’t for you. It’s for the people they still need to pick up the game. And when they do, those people will remark at how much content there is. Early adopters are suckers anymore, who usually say exactly what you are saying. And I mean no offense. I’m a sucker, too.

      See Fallout 76

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      Thats a good question to those who have spent 1K+ hours in Skyrim and Fallout 4. Why go back? Skyrim didn’t even have a base building system.

      I’ll bet you’ll be back for the first big expansion. And that seems to be BGS’ bet too.

      • BigFig
        link
        English
        711 months ago

        Except those were vastly more interesting worlds

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          And that’s Starfield’s big problem. I’ve played the game and other than most people here I genuinely enjoyed it (and I’ll die on my “at least the role-playing aspect is better than Fallout 4” hill), but it’s also the first Bethesda game that I feel I’ve completed. I’m pretty sure that I’ve finished the handcrafted content. There’s no random interesting caves, camps or whatevers with unique design, little quest or just a bit of lore to stumble upon, just endless procedurally generated wastes dotted with the same three dungeons on repeat.