I see a lot of down votes and conflict in privacy communities about which one is the best, but tbh, if you’re not using fb/sms/email you’re pretty much the top 1% of privacy users. So as far as we should be concerned, that’s good enough.

The debates about signal being better than matrix etc are fine to have, but IMO it’d be more productive if we spoke more about how to get granny, the boss, the nephew, etc on signal, matrix etc. Doesn’t matter how good any of our privacy apps are, I almost never meet a single person who uses any of them and have to default to fb. Most people over yonder haven’t even heard of the apps that aren’t telegram or signal.

IMO targeting the discorders(/telegramers) is the lowest hanging fruit. Discord/tg is already bridge compatible with matrix, if you can use LibreOffice, you can set up the t2bot discord-matrix bridge.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    Signal is okay as much as privacy is concerned, but it doesn’t solve all the problems with communications in real world. For instance its centralized design means it can be easily blocked, a private Matrix server on the other hand will not even make it on the radar.

  • Memento Mori
    link
    211 months ago

    Agreed! I could only convince a few people to use them but that’s better than none!

  • Synapse
    link
    111 months ago

    My position is the following: If you want to contact me, you have Signal or Email. My family is on Signal, my friends are too. If you can’t be bothered to use anything else than Whatsapp to reach out to me, then we don’t need to keep in touch.