• @baatliwala
    link
    English
    1811 months ago

    What? People are already learning what Nearby Share is. Why change the fucking branding?

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      1211 months ago

      The point exactly. Google does not do successful branding, it’s against some internal mandate apparently.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Makes a new messaging app every few years

        Complains when iMessage has a monopoly

        The complaints are valid, but Google had more than enough power to compete

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1411 months ago

    Meh, it was as confusing as Android Nearby Share being incompatible with Windows Nearby Share.

    • Baron Von J
      link
      English
      411 months ago

      Seriously what’s that about?

      • m-p{3}
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 months ago

        Two companies using a somewhat generic name for their own implementation of a system that is not interoperable.

        • Flax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Weren’t they planning on making it interoperable?

        • Baron Von J
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          It just seems like FTC or something should be objecting to whichever such product came out second.

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 months ago

    Remember when you could just tap your phone on someone else’s?

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy
      link
      English
      311 months ago

      That never worked right for me. Every phone had its NFC chip at a different location on the back, so you always had to figure out where the hell you had to tap the phones.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        People know where their chip is now though because of contactless